首页> 外文期刊>South African medical journal = >Trends and inequities in amenable mortality between 1997 and 2012 in South Africa
【24h】

Trends and inequities in amenable mortality between 1997 and 2012 in South Africa

机译:南非1997年至2012年期间应计死亡率的趋势和不平等现象

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Amenable mortality comprises causes of death that should not occur with timely and effective healthcare. It is commonly used to assess healthcare performance. It could also be used to assess the effectiveness of the pending National Health Insurance (NHI) in South Africa (SA), but to do this, the level and distribution of amenable mortality are required using a local list of amenable causesOBJECTIVES: To establish an amenable cause-of-death list appropriate for SA and to determine the levels, trends, geographical distribution, population group differences and international comparisons of mortality amenable to healthcareMETHODS: A local list of amenable causes of death was developed with input from public health and disease-specific medical experts. The Second SA National Burden of Disease estimates were reclassified into amenable mortality. Analyses of age-standardised death rates (ASDRs) and amenable mortality proportions were conducted by province and population group between 1997 and 2012. Excess mortality in relation to the best-performing province and population group was also analysed. ASDRs for SA were compared with those of European Union (EU) and Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) countriesRESULTS: The local list of amenable conditions contained 45 causes of death. There were large disparities in amenable mortality between provinces and population groups, which did not attenuate over time. There was an average annual percentage increase in amenable ASDRs, but when HIV/AIDS was excluded from the analysis there was an average annual decrease of 1.12%. In the post-peak HIV/AIDS period between 2008 and 2012, an annual average of 207 810 amenable deaths could have been saved if all provinces had the same ASDR as the Western Cape. SAs ASDR was 2.6 and 2.2 times higher than that of the worst-performing EU and OECD country, respectivelyCONCLUSIONS: This is the first study known to the authors that has established a local amenable mortality list and described the epidemiology of amenable mortality in SA. Amenable mortality could be used as an indicator of the performance of the pending NHI over time and, in combination with other indicators, could identify areas of the health system that require improvement. Benchmarking could also quantify gaps in health system performance between geographical regions and indicate whether these are reduced with time.
机译:背景:可接受的死亡率包括在及时有效的医疗保健中不应发生的死亡原因。它通常用于评估医疗保健绩效。它也可以用来评估南非(SA)待定的国民健康保险(NHI)的有效性,但是要做到这一点,需要使用当地一个适当的病因清单来确定适当的死亡率水平和分布。适用于SA的适宜死亡原因清单,并确定适合医疗保健的死亡率的水平,趋势,地理分布,人群差异和国际比较方法:根据公共卫生和疾病的数据,制定了局部适宜死亡原因清单特定的医学专家。将第二次SA国家疾病负担估算值重新分类为可满足的死亡率。在1997年至2012年之间,按省和人群进行了年龄标准化死亡率(ASDR)和可接受的死亡率比例分析。还分析了表现最佳的省和人群的超额死亡率。将SA的ASDR与欧洲联盟(EU)和经济合作与发展组织(OECD)国家的ASDR进行了比较。结果:当地的适宜条件清单包含45个死亡原因。各省和人口群体之间的可满足死亡率之间存在巨大差异,但随着时间的推移并没有减少。可接受的ASDR的年均增长率为百分数,但如果将艾滋病毒/艾滋病排除在分析范围之外,则年均增长率为1.12%。如果所有省份都具有与西开普省相同的ASDR,那么在2008年至2012年的高峰期艾滋病毒/艾滋病期间,每年平均可以挽救207 810例可挽救的死亡。结论SAS的ASDR分别是表现最差的欧盟和OECD国家的2.6倍和2.2倍。结论:这是作者所知的第一项研究,该研究建立了当地可满足的死亡率清单,并描述了SA可满足的死亡率的流行病学。适当的死亡率可以用作待定的国民健康保险随时间推移的绩效指标,并且可以与其他指标一起确定需要改善的卫生系统领域。标杆管理还可以量化地理区域之间卫生系统绩效方面的差距,并指出这些差距是否会随着时间而缩小。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号