首页> 外文期刊>Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research >Effect of pasture allowance and cows’ lactation stage on perennial ryegrass sward quality, pasture dry matter intake and milk performance of Holstein-Friesian cows
【24h】

Effect of pasture allowance and cows’ lactation stage on perennial ryegrass sward quality, pasture dry matter intake and milk performance of Holstein-Friesian cows

机译:牧草补贴和奶牛泌乳阶段对荷斯坦-弗里斯兰奶牛多年生黑麦草饲料质量,牧草干物质摄入量和产奶性能的影响

获取原文
       

摘要

Efficient exploitation of grass for cattle requires the application of appropriated grassland management strategies to maximize pasture dry matter intake (PDMI) while maintaining high sward quality over the grazing season by applying an adequate stocking rate (SR). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two SR (cows ha -1 ), low (L, 3.9) and high (H, 4.8), on swards chemical composition, PDMI and milk performance of Holstein-Friesian cows (n=72) at two stages of lactation (SL), spring (S) and autumn (A) calving. Animals were randomly assigned to four groups (LS, LA, HS and HA) in a 2x2 factorial design. The high SR groups completed 5 rotations, with more grazing days (+13), lower pre- (14.3) and post-grazing (5.3) heights (cm) and higher herbage utilization (81.7%). The herbage allowance and PDMI (kg DM cow -1 day -1 ) were lower (p<0.05) with high SR (16.4 and 13.4) but higher (p<0.05) (g kg -1 DM) protein (149.1), carbohydrates (166.7) and digestibility (746.8) and lower (p<0.05) DM (18.4%), acid (283.5) and neutral detergent (508.6) fibre (g kg -1 DM) were found. Sward quality is deteriorated (p<0.05) from rotation 1 to 5, lower decrease occurred with high SR. Milk yield (MY) was higher (p<0.05) in spring calving cows (24.8 kg cow -1 day -1 ), with the lowest (p<0.05) milk protein (28.9) and fat (36.9) (g kg -1 DM). No differences were found on MY between treatments for SR, but higher protein and fat were reached using high SR. Increasing SR is achieved lower PDMI, but higher sward quality without penalizing MY and quality. Efficient exploitation of grass for cattle requires the application of appropriated grassland management strategies to maximize pasture dry matter intake (PDMI) while maintaining high sward quality by allocating cows to an adequate pasture allowance (PA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two PA, low (L) vs. high (H), on sward quality, PDMI and milk performance of Holstein-Friesian cows (n=72) at two lactation stages (LS), early (E) vs. middle (M). Cows were randomly assigned to four groups (LE, LM, HE and HM) in a 2×2 factorial design. The low PA treatments completed 5 rotations, with more grazing days (+13), lower pre- (14.3) and post-grazing (5.3) sward heights (cm) and higher herbage utilization (81.7%). The low PA had higher stocking rate than the high PA treatments (4.8 vs. 3.9 cows ha -1 ) and lower PDMI (13.4 kg vs. 14.4 DM cow -1 day -1 ) with higher ( p <0.05) (g kg -1 DM) protein (149.1), carbohydrates (166.7) and digestibility (746.8) while lower ( p <0.05) DM (18.4%), acid (283.5) and neutral detergent (508.6) fibers (g kg -1 DM). Sward quality is deteriorated ( p <0.05) from rotation 1 to 5, lower decrease was found on low PA treatments. Milk yield (MY) was higher ( p <0.05) in cows at early LS (24.8 kg cow -1 day -1 ), with the lowest ( p <0.05) protein (28.9) and fat (36.9) content (g kg -1 ). No differences were found on MY between PA treatments, but higher protein and fat content were observed on low PA. Decreasing PA resulted in higher sward and milk quality without penalizing MY. Efficient exploitation of grass for cattle requires the application of appropriated grassland management strategies to maximize pasture dry matter intake (PDMI) while maintaining high sward quality by allocating cows to an adequate pasture allowance (PA). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of two PA, low (L) vs. high (H), on sward quality, PDMI and milk performance of Holstein-Friesian cows (n=72) at two lactation stages (LS), early (E) vs. middle (M). Cows were randomly assigned to four groups (LE, LM, HE and HM) in a 2×2 factorial design. The low PA treatments completed 5 rotations, with more grazing days (+13), lower pre- (14.3) and post-grazing (5.3) sward heights (cm) and higher herbage utilization (81.7%). The low PA had higher stocking rate than the high PA treatments (4.8 vs. 3.9 cows ha -1 )and lower PDMI (13.4 kg vs. 14.4 DM cow -1 day -1 ) with
机译:有效地开发牛用草需要应用适当的草地管理策略,以最大限度地提高牧草干物质摄入量(PDMI),同时通过采用适当的放养率(SR)保持放牧季节的高牧草质量。本研究的目的是研究两种低SR(co ha ha -1),低(L,3.9)和高(H,4.8)对荷斯坦-弗里斯兰奶牛(s n)的草地化学成分,PDMI和产奶性能的影响= 72)在哺乳期(SL),春季(S)和秋季(A)产犊两个阶段。以2x2因子设计将动物随机分为四组(LS,LA,HS和HA)。高SR组完成5次轮作,放牧天数增加(+13),放牧前高度(cm)降低(14.3)和放牧后(5.3)高度(cm),草料利用率更高(81.7%)。牧草津贴和PDMI(kg DM牛-1天-1)较低(p <0.05),SR较高(16.4和13.4),但较高(p <0.05)(g kg -1 DM)蛋白(149.1),碳水化合物发现(166.7)和可消化性(746.8)及更低(p <0.05)DM(18.4%),酸(283.5)和中性去污剂(508.6)纤维(g kg -1 DM)。旋转1到5时,草皮质量变差(p <0.05),SR较高时,降低的幅度较小。春季犊牛(24.8 kg牛-1天-1)的产奶量(MY)较高(p <0.05),最低(p <0.05)乳蛋白(28.9)和脂肪(36.9)(g kg -1) DM)。 SR处理之间的MY没有发现差异,但是高SR可以达到更高的蛋白质和脂肪。降低SRMI可以提高SR,但可以提高草皮质量,而不会损害MY和质量。有效地开发牛用草需要应用适当的草地管理策略,以最大程度地增加牧草干物质摄入量(PDMI),同时通过将母牛分配给足够的牧草津贴(PA)来保持高牧草质量。这项研究的目的是研究两个低泌乳期(L)和高喂(H)的PA对荷斯坦-弗里斯兰奶牛(n = 72)在两个泌乳阶段(LS)的饲草质量,PDMI和产奶性能的影响,早期(E)与中等(M)。以2×2因子设计将母牛随机分为四组(LE,LM,HE和HM)。低PA处理完成了5个轮作,放牧天数(+13),放牧前高度(cm)降低了前放牧(cm)的前(14.3)和放牧后(5.3)的降低,草场利用率更高(81.7%)。与高PA处理相比,低PA的放牧率更高(4.8 vs. 3.9牛ha -1),PDMI较低(13.4 kg与14.4 DM牛-1 day -1),且较高(p <0.05)(g kg- 1 DM)蛋白(149.1),碳水化合物(166.7)和消化率(746.8),而较低(p <0.05)DM(18.4%),酸(283.5)和中性去污剂(508.6)纤维(g kg -1 DM)。从第1轮到第5轮,草皮质量变差(p <0.05),在低PA处理下发现降低幅度较小。 LS早期(24.8 kg牛-1天-1)的奶牛的产奶量(MY)较高(p <0.05),最低(p <0.05)蛋白质(28.9)和脂肪(36.9)(g kg- 1)。在PA处理之间,MY没有发现差异,但在低PA下观察到较高的蛋白质和脂肪含量。降低PA可以提高草皮和牛奶的品质,而不会损害MY。有效地开发牛用草需要应用适当的草地管理策略,以最大程度地增加牧草干物质摄入量(PDMI),同时通过将母牛分配给足够的牧草津贴(PA)来保持高牧草质量。这项研究的目的是研究两个低泌乳期(L)和高喂(H)的PA对荷斯坦-弗里斯兰奶牛(n = 72)在两个泌乳阶段(LS)的饲草质量,PDMI和产奶性能的影响,早期(E)与中等(M)。以2×2因子设计将母牛随机分为四组(LE,LM,HE和HM)。低PA处理完成了5个轮作,放牧天数(+13),放牧前高度(cm)降低了前放牧(cm)的前(14.3)和放牧后(5.3)的降低,草场利用率更高(81.7%)。与高PA处理相比,低PA的放牧率更高(4.8 vs. 3.9牛ha -1),PDMI较低(13.4 kg相对于14.4 DM牛-1 day -1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号