首页> 外文期刊>Social Sciences >The Importance of National Ethos in Military Victories
【24h】

The Importance of National Ethos in Military Victories

机译:民族精神在军事胜利中的重要性

获取原文
       

摘要

When nations are violently threatened, the choices that they make in order to cope with the challenge of war reflect different alternative possible reactions. They may choose to fiercely fight their battles; they may prefer to surrender, and sometimes the options lay in-between. One puzzle is, therefore, what makes nations fight, and more importantly—what causes them eventually to win or to lose the war. In search for an answer, this study inquires through secondary sources three historical case studies from World War II: Britain, France and Germany, and reviews how each of these major European powers acted throughout the war. After each historical description, the study examines the part that national ethos played in the manner in which each state handled war in moments of crisis. The national ethos of a people is the creed formed from the shared values and traditions through which the nation views its past, present and future; it is the integrating element that defines a nation’s identity and bonds it into a coherent social group. The study reveals how national ethos is intertwined with another phenomenon of social psychology that turns it into a crucial factor in the management of international campaigns: war enthusiasm. Since national ethos is so crucial for the results of the war that a country might lead in order to survive or prosper, it is imperative for decision makers to bear in mind that it is also subject to a process of shaping and reshaping, as the Soviets have proved in relation to their Russian national ethos during World War II. A word of caution, however, is noteworthy: a wide historical perspective shows that even though the right kind of national ethos is essential for winning a war it is far from being enough. Hence national ethos proves, at the end of the day, to be a necessary condition for military victory but certainly not a sufficient one.
机译:当国家受到暴力威胁时,它们为应对战争挑战而做出的选择反映了不同的替代可能反应。他们可能选择激烈战斗。他们可能更愿意投降,有时选择介于两者之间。因此,一个难题是,使国家战斗的原因,更重要的是,是什么原因导致国家最终赢得战争或输掉战争。为了寻找答案,本研究通过第二手资料查询了第二次世界大战期间的三个历史案例研究:英国,法国和德国,并回顾了这些主要欧洲大国在整个战争中的行为。在每个历史描述之后,该研究考察了民族风气在每个国家在危机时刻处理战争的方式所起的作用。人民的民族风气是由共同的价值观和传统构成的信条,通过这种价值观和传统,民族可以查看其过去,现在和未来。它是整合元素,它定义了一个国家的身份并将其绑定到一个连贯的社会群体中。这项研究揭示了民族精神是如何与另一种社会心理学现象交织在一起的,这种现象使它成为管理国际战役的关键因素:战争热情。由于民族精神对于战争的结果至关重要,因此一个国家为了生存或繁荣而可能要领导这个民族,因此决策者必须牢记,它也要像苏维埃一样受到塑造和重塑的过程的影响。在第二次世界大战期间已经证明了他们的俄罗斯民族风气。但是,要提一个注意的词是值得注意的:广泛的历史观点表明,即使正确的民族精神对于赢得战争至关重要,但这远远不够。因此,民族精神最终证明是取得军事胜利的必要条件,但肯定不是充分的条件。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号