首页> 外文期刊>She Ji; The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation >The Assessment of Meaningful Outcomes from Co-design: A Case Study from the Energy Sector
【24h】

The Assessment of Meaningful Outcomes from Co-design: A Case Study from the Energy Sector

机译:协同设计对有意义结果的评估:能源部门的案例研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Even though co-design is a well-accepted approach for designing to meet user needs, what influence it has on design outcomes remains unclear. This article presents the co-design process of a prototype energy advice service. We evaluate the impact this process had on the outcome over time, demonstrate how co-design generated informative insights, and identify the benefits and challenges of employing a co-design process to design and develop meaningful content for future ‘information-intensive’ services. A theoretical framework, a “think aloud” approach, and systematic data coding, enabled us to uncover user perceptions of the evolving design qualities. This meaning-making co-design process enabled user needs to surface and be iteratively addressed. As the content of the reports became increasingly tailored, and the users’ familiarity with the topic increased, the process highlighted further evolving and underlying information needs. This confirms the value of adopting a content first approach when designing information intensive services and foregrounding meaning making within the complex energy demand reduction context.
机译:尽管协同设计是一种可以满足用户需求的公认设计方法,但它对设计结果的影响尚不清楚。本文介绍了原型能源咨询服务的协同设计过程。我们评估该过程随着时间的推移对结果产生的影响,展示协同设计如何产生有益的见解,并确定采用协同设计过程为未来的“信息密集型”服务设计和开发有意义的内容的好处和挑战。理论框架,“大声思考”方法和系统的数据编码使我们能够发现用户对不断发展的设计质量的看法。这种有意义的协同设计过程使用户需要浮出水面并得到反复解决。随着报告内容的量身定制以及用户对该主题的熟悉程度的提高,该过程突显了进一步发展和潜在的信息需求。这证实了在设计信息密集型服务和在降低能源需求的复杂环境中实现前景的意义时采用内容优先方法的价值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号