首页> 外文期刊>Social Media + Society >Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Researcha??Introduction
【24h】

Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Researcha??Introduction

机译:伦理学作为方法:大数据研究时代的伦理学?简介

获取原文
       

摘要

This is an introduction to the special issue of a??Ethics as Methods: Doing Ethics in the Era of Big Data Research.a?? Building on a variety of theoretical paradigms (i.e., critical theory, [new] materialism, feminist ethics, theory of cultural techniques) and frameworks (i.e., contextual integrity, deflationary perspective, ethics of care), the Special Issue contributes specific cases and fine-grained conceptual distinctions to ongoing discussions about the ethics in data-driven research. In the second decade of the 21st century, a grand narrative is emerging that posits knowledge derived from data analytics as true, because of the objective qualities of data, their means of collection and analysis, and the sheer size of the data set. The by-product of this grand narrative is that the qualitative aspects of behavior and experience that form the data are diminished, and the human is removed from the process of analysis. This situates data science as a process of analysis performed by the tool, which obscures human decisions in the process. The scholars involved in this Special Issue problematize the assumptions and trends in big data research and point out the crisis in accountability that emerges from using such data to make societal interventions. Our collaborators offer a range of answers to the question of how to configure ethics through a methodological framework in the context of the prevalence of big data, neural networks, and automated, algorithmic governance of much of human socia(bi)lity
机译:这是对“作为方法的道德:大数据研究时代的道德规范”的特殊问题的介绍。本期专刊建立在各种理论范式(即批判理论,[新]唯物主义,女权主义伦理学,文化技术理论)和框架(即情境完整性,通缩观点,护理伦理学)的基础上,为具体案例做出了贡献-对正在进行的有关数据驱动研究中的伦理学讨论的概念上的区别。在21世纪的第二个十年中,由于数据的客观质量,收集和分析的手段以及数据集的庞大规模,正在出现一种宏大的叙述,它将从数据分析中获得的知识假定为真实。这种宏大叙事的副产品是,减少了形成数据的行为和经验的质性方面,从而使人类脱离了分析过程。这将数据科学定位为该工具执行的分析过程,这模糊了该过程中的人为决策。参与本期特刊的学者对大数据研究的假设和趋势提出了质疑,并指出了使用此类数据进行社会干预时出现的问责制危机。我们的合作者针对如何在大数据盛行,神经网络以及许多人类社会自动进行算法治理的情况下通过方法框架配置道德问题提供了一系列答案

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号