首页> 外文期刊>Shinavāyi/shināsi-i >Comparison of click and CE-chirp-evoked human auditory brainstem responses: a preliminary study
【24h】

Comparison of click and CE-chirp-evoked human auditory brainstem responses: a preliminary study

机译:点击和CE chi诱发的人类听觉脑干反应的比较:初步研究

获取原文
           

摘要

Background and Aim: CE-Chirp stimulus has been developed for stimulating more apical regions of the cochlea. Inadequacy of clinical information on the latency and amplitude characteristics of ABR evoked by CE-chirp at different levels in addition to discrepancy in identifying earlier ABR waveforms using CE-chirp stimulus are the reasons of this study.Methods: This study was done by recoding ABR to click and broad-band CE-chirp stimuli in the right ear of 15 non-randomly selected normal-hearing individuals with age range of 20-30 years old. Frequency of recordable waves I and III, as well as threshold, amplitude, and latency of wave V were compared in response to click and CE-Chirp at 20-80 dB nHL.Results: At 80 dB nHL, click stimulus evokes waves I and III more frequently than chirp stimulus (p=0.012 and p=0.016 respectively). At 20 and 40 dB nHL, wave V latency evoked by CE-Chirp is significantly longer than wave V latency evoked by click (p=0.012 and p=0.0001 respectively); however, at 80 dB nHL wave V latency evoked by CE-Chirp is shorter than click (p=0.0001). Wave V amplitude for CE-Chirp is significantly larger than for click at levels of 20, 40 and 60 dB nHL (p=0.0001, p=0.0001 and p=0.013 respectively). Wave V threshold is approximately 5 dB lower with CE-chirp compared to click (p=0.014).Conclusion: Except at high levels, CE-Chirp evokes wave V with larger amplitude and lower threshold than click. Possibility of recording earlier ABR waves is reduced with CE-chirp stimulus.
机译:背景与目的:CE-Chirp刺激物已被开发用于刺激耳蜗的更多顶端区域。 CE-chirp在不同水平上诱发的ABR潜伏期和幅度特性的临床信息不足,以及使用CE-chirp刺激识别早期ABR波形的差异是本研究的原因。在15个年龄范围为20至30岁的非随机选择的正常听力人士的右耳中单击并进行宽带CE线性调频刺激。比较了可记录波I和III的频率以及波V的阈值,幅度和潜伏时间,以响应在20-80 dB nHL时的Click和CE-Chirp。结果:在80 dB nHL处,单击刺激会引起I和III波III比chi刺激更为频繁(分别为p = 0.012和p = 0.016)。在nHL为20和40 dB时,CE-Chirp引起的V波潜伏期明显长于咔嗒声引起的V波潜伏期(分别为p = 0.012和p = 0.0001);但是,CE-Chirp引发的nHL波在80 dB时的V潜伏期短于咔嗒声(p = 0.0001)。 CE-Chirp的波V幅度明显大于20、40和60 dB nHL级别的喀哒声(分别为p = 0.0001,p = 0.0001和p = 0.013)。与click声相比,CE-chirp的波V阈值大约低5 dB(p = 0.014)。结论:除了高电平外,CE-Chirp引起的波V的振幅和阈值均比click声低。使用CE线性调频脉冲刺激可以减少记录早期ABR波的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号