...
首页> 外文期刊>Scientia Agraria Paranaensis >Avalia??o de fungicidas no controle de antracnose e mancha alvo, e no rendimento da cultura da soja
【24h】

Avalia??o de fungicidas no controle de antracnose e mancha alvo, e no rendimento da cultura da soja

机译:评价杀菌剂在控制炭疽病和目标斑病以及大豆作物产量中的作用

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Soybean is one of the main crop in the world, because is a source of food products, for animals and humans, besides its use as biofuels. Although n ew technologies have been used in this crop, its productivity has been limited mainly by the occurrence of diseases, such as anthracnose ( Colletotrichum truncatum) and target spot ( Corynespora cassiicola ) . Thus, the aim of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of fungicides for the control of anthracnose and target spot, applied to the leaves, in a commercial area in the north of Mato Grosso State, Brazil. The experimental design was randomized blocks with eight treatments and three repetitions. The treatments were: T1 - Control; T2 - 1 st Application: Pyraclostrobin + Epoxiconazole, 2 nd Application: fluxapyroxad + Pyraclostrobin; T3 - 1 st Application: Azoxystrobin, 2 nd Application: Azoxystrobin; T4 - 1 st Application: Pyraclostrobin, 2 nd Application: Pyraclostrobin + Epoxiconazol; T5 - 1 st Application: Fluxapyroxad + Pyraclostrobin, 2 nd Application: Fluxapyroxad + Pyraclostrobin; T6 - 1 st Application: Trifloxystrobin + Prothioconazol, 2 nd Application: Trifloxystrobin + Prothioconazol; T7 - 1 st Application: Picoxystrobin + Cyproconazol, 2 nd Application: Picoxystrobin + Cyproconazol; T8 - 1 st Application: Tebuconazol, 2 nd Application: Tebuconazol. The first application of fungicides was at soybean flowering and the second, 15 days after the first application. There was no statistical difference among treatments to plant height, height of 1 st pod, number of pods per plant and number of grains per plant. In relation to anthracnose, treatments did not differ significantly; however, treatment T2 was more efficient in controlling target spot. The treatments that increased the weight of 1000 seeds (g) were T1, T2, T5 and T6, but there was no difference among treatments for productivity (sacks ha -1 ).
机译:大豆是世界上主要的农作物之一,因为除了用作生物燃料之外,它还是动物和人类食品的来源。尽管很少有技术用于该作物,但其生产率主要受到诸如炭疽病(炭疽菌)和目标点(Corynespora cassiicola)等疾病的限制。因此,这项工作的目的是在巴西马托格罗索州北部的一个商业区评估杀菌剂控制炭疽病和叶上目标斑的效率。实验设计是随机区组,进行八次治疗和三次重复。治疗是:T1-对照; T2-第1次应用:吡咯菌胺+环氧康唑,第二次应用:fluxapyroxad +吡菌胺; T3-第一次应用:阿奇莫斯特罗宾,第二次应用:阿奇莫斯特罗宾; T4-第一次应用:吡菌胺,第二次应用:吡菌酯+环氧西那唑; T5-第1次应用:氟虫吡咯+吡菌酯,第二次应用:Fluxapyroxad +吡菌酰胺; T6-第1次施用:三氟杀螨醇+硫代康那唑,第二次施用:三氟杀螨醇+丙硫磺那唑; T7-1:第一个应用:吡咯菌酯+环丙唑醇,第二个应用:吡草酯+环丙唑醇; T8-第1项应用:戊唑醇,第2项应用:戊唑醇。第一次施用杀菌剂是在大豆开花期,第二次是在第一次施用后15天。植株高度,第一荚果高度,单株荚果数和单株籽粒数之间的处理之间无统计学差异。关于炭疽病,治疗方法没有显着差异。但是,处理T2在控制目标点上更为有效。增加1000粒种子(g)重量的处理方法为T1,T2,T5和T6,但各处理方法之间的生产率没有差异(袋ha -1)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号