首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of primary health care. >Intravenous Urography versus Ultrasonography in Evaluation of Women with recurrent Urinary Tract Infection
【24h】

Intravenous Urography versus Ultrasonography in Evaluation of Women with recurrent Urinary Tract Infection

机译:静脉尿路造影与超声检查对复发性尿路感染妇女的评估

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Intravenous urography and ultrasonography were compared prospectively in 120 women with recurrent urinary tract infection. The median age was 44 years (range 15–85). There was good correlation between the two methods in detecting hydronephrosis, calculi ? 5 mm, and major post-pyelonephritic scarring. Urography was superior in detecting small cortical scars, slight caliceal dilatation, and ? 4 mm calculi. Based on the good results, low cost, and absence of radiation hazards or contrast media reactions, we conclude that ultrasonography may replace urography when a radiological screening of the upper urinary tract is deemed necessary in women with recurrent urinary tract infection.
机译:前瞻性比较了120例复发性尿路感染妇女的静脉泌尿造影和超声检查。中位年龄为44岁(15-85岁)。两种方法在检测肾积水,结石和结石方面有良好的相关性。 5毫米,并有严重的肾盂肾炎后瘢痕形成。尿路造影在检测小皮层疤痕,轻微的CALCALAL扩张和? 4毫米结石。基于良好的结果,较低的成本以及没有辐射危害或造影剂反应的情况,我们得出结论,当认为复发性尿路感染的女性有必要对上尿路进行放射学检查时,超声检查可以代替尿路造影。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号