...
首页> 外文期刊>Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia >A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery
【24h】

A comparative evaluation of intrathecal bupivacaine alone, sufentanil or butorphanol in combination with bupivacaine for endoscopic urological surgery

机译:鞘内注射布比卡因,舒芬太尼或布托啡诺联合布比卡因用于内镜泌尿外科手术的比较评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: The objective of the present study was to compare the onset, degree and recovery time of sensory and motor block and hemodynamic effects of intrathecal bupivacaine alone and bupivacaine with sufentanil or butorphanol in endoscopic urological surgeries. Methods: In a randomized, double-blind study, 90 patients of either sex and age, belonging to ASA Grades I and II, scheduled for elective endoscopic urological surgeries under spinal anesthesia, were allocated into three groups of 30 each. Patients received either 2.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric buypivacaine 12.5 mg (Group A), 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg with 10 μg sufentanil (Group B) or 1.5 ml of 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine 7.5 mg with 25 μg butorphanol (Group C). Vital parameters, level, duration and regression of sensory block and motor block and side-effects were recorded and compared. Statistical Analysis: Analysis of variance (ANOVA), post hoc test and Chi-square test were used. Results: Intrathecal addition of sufentanil/butorphanol prolonged the duration of sensory block (DOSB) compared with bupivacaine alone (DOSB being 156.83±23.83 min, 170.87 ± 22.21 min and 171.17 ± 23.99 min in groups A, B and C, respectively) without altering the duration of motor blockade. Bromage score 3 was achieved in 100%, 90% and 54.4% patients in groups A, B and C, respectively. The time to first request for analgesia was 112 ± 46.3 min, 323 ± 65.0 min and 299 ± 73.9 min in groups A, B and C, respectively. Complications were reduced by the addition of butorphanol, which also has a lower tendency than sufentanil to produce pruritus (60%). Conclusions: The analgesia was significantly prolonged in groups B and C; group C had a less-intense motor block. Complications were reduced by the addition of butorphanol, which also has a lower tendency than sufentanil to produce pruritus. Thus, this combination of butorphanol with low-dose bupivacaine is especially beneficial in the geriatric group of patients who have multiple co-morbid conditions.
机译:背景:本研究的目的是比较内镜下泌尿外科手术中鞘内注射布比卡因和布比卡因联合舒芬太尼或布托啡诺的鞘内注射布比卡因和布比卡因的感觉,运动阻滞的发作,程度和恢复时间,以及血流动力学效应。方法:在一项随机,双盲研究中,将90例按性别和年龄分属于ASAⅠ级和Ⅱ级ASA并计划在脊髓麻醉下进行选择性内镜泌尿外科手术的患者分为三组,每组30例。患者接受2.5 ml的0.5%高压布比卡因12.5 mg(A组),1.5 ml的0.5%高压布比卡因7.5 mg和10μg舒芬太尼(B组)或1.5 ml的0.5%高压布比卡因7.5 mg和25μgButorphanol(组) C)。记录并比较重要参数,感觉障碍和运动障碍的水平,持续时间和消退以及副作用。统计分析:使用方差分析(ANOVA),事后检验和卡方检验。结果:与单独使用布比卡因相比,鞘内添加舒芬太尼/丁苯啡诺延长了感觉阻滞(DOSB)的持续时间(A,B和C组分别为156.83±23.83分钟,170.87±22.21分钟和171.17±23.99分钟),而没有改变运动封锁的持续时间。 A组,B组和C组的100%,90%和54.4%的患者分别达到3分。 A组,B组和C组首次镇痛的时间分别为112±46.3分钟,323±65.0分钟和299±73.9分钟。通过添加布托啡诺减少了并发症,布托啡诺的发生率也低于舒芬太尼(60%)。结论:B组和C组镇痛明显延长。 C组有较弱的运动阻滞。通过添加布托啡诺可以减少并发症,布托啡诺也比舒芬太尼具有降低瘙痒的趋势。因此,这种布托啡诺与小剂量布比卡因的组合在患有多种合并症的老年患者中特别有益。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号