首页> 外文期刊>Sage Open Medicine >Performance of the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale for caregiving research:
【24h】

Performance of the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale for caregiving research:

机译:十项流行病学研究中心抑郁症护理研究量表的性能:

获取原文
           

摘要

Objectives:The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression (CESD) scale has been useful in a broad spectrum of health research on patient and population outcomes. A brief version is used when depressive symptoms are not the primary focus. Rasch (item response) analysis previously demonstrated potential problems with positively worded items. We tested the 10-item CESD (CESD-10) scale and considered an 8-item version with both psychometric and Rasch analyses.Methods:This was a special sample of 2067 caregivers from three existing US databases. We describe item response patterns and internal constancy in addition to Rasch scale results.Results:There were few problems with missing data, and internal consistency was high (alpha = 0.86–0.88) for both CESD versions. Rasch analysis indicated that one of the positive items (“hopeful about future”) could be dropped.Conclusions:We partly confirmed prior work that suggested dropping positive items for the CESD-10. Among caregivers, item-level problems and scaling pro...
机译:目标:流行病学研究中心抑郁症(CESD)量表在有关患者和人群结局的广泛健康研究中很有用。当抑郁症症状不是主要重点时,使用简短的版本。 Rasch(项目响应)分析先前证明了措词正面的潜在问题。我们测试了10个项目的CESD(CESD-10)量表,并考虑了8个项目的心理计量学和Rasch分析。方法:这是来自美国三个现有数据库的2067名看护者的特殊样本。除了Rasch量表的结果外,我们还描述了项目的响应模式和内部稳定性。结果:两种CESD版本的数据丢失问题很少,内部一致性很高(alpha = 0.86-0.88)。 Rasch分析表明,可以删除其中一个积极项目(“对未来充满希望”)。结论:我们部分确认了先前的工作,其中建议删除CESD-10的积极项目。在看护者中,项目级问题和扩展规模...

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号