...
首页> 外文期刊>Scandinavian journal of Work, Environment and Health >Health economic evaluations of interventions to increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behavior at the workplace: a systematic review
【24h】

Health economic evaluations of interventions to increase physical activity and decrease sedentary behavior at the workplace: a systematic review

机译:增加身体活动并减少工作场所久坐行为的干预措施的卫生经济学评估:系统评价

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Objective The workplace is an ideal setting to implement public health strategies, but economic justification for such interventions is needed. Therefore, we performed a critical appraisal and synthesis of health economic evaluations (HEE) of workplace interventions aiming to increase physical activity (PA) and/or decrease sedentary behavior (SB).Methods A comprehensive search filter was developed using appropriate guidelines, such as the Peer Review of Electronic Search Strategies (PRESS) checklist, and published search algorithms. Six databases and hand searches were used to identify eligible studies. Full HEE of workplace interventions targeting PA/SB were included. Methodological quality was assessed using the Consensus Health Economic Criteria (CHEC) list. Two researchers independently performed all procedures. Hedges’ g was calculated to compare intervention effects. Outcomes from HEE were recalculated in 2017 euros and benefit-standardized.Results Eighteen HEE were identified that fulfilled on average 68% of the CHEC list criteria. Most studies showed improvements in PA/SB, but effects were small and thus, their relevance is questionable. Interventions were heterogeneous, no particular intervention type was found to be more effective. HEE were heterogeneous regarding methodological approaches and the selection of cost categories was inconsistent. Indirect costs were the main cost driver. In all studies, effects on costs were subject to substantial uncertainty.Conclusions Due to small effects and uncertain impact on costs, the economic evidence of worksite PA/SB-interventions remains unclear. Future studies are needed to determine effective strategies. The HEE of such interventions should be developed using guidelines and validated measures for productivity costs. Additionally, studies should model the long-term costs and effects because of the long pay-back time of PA/SB interventions.
机译:目的工作场所是实施公共卫生策略的理想场所,但需要经济上合理的干预措施。因此,我们对工作场所干预措施进行了严格的评估和健康经济评估(HEE)综合,旨在增加体力活动(PA)和/或减少久坐行为(SB)方法。使用适当的准则开发了一个全面的搜索过滤器,例如电子搜索策略(PRESS)同行评审清单,以及已发布的搜索算法。使用六个数据库和人工搜索来确定合格的研究。包括针对PA / SB的工作场所干预的完整HEE。方法学质量使用《共识健康经济标准》(CHEC)清单进行评估。两名研究人员独立执行所有程序。计算对冲g来比较干预效果。 HEE的结果以2017欧元重新计算并以福利标准化。结果确定了18项HEE,平均满足CHEC列表标准的68%。大多数研究表明PA / SB有所改善,但效果很小,因此其相关性值得怀疑。干预措施是异类的,没有发现特定的干预类型更有效。 HEE在方法论方法上是异类的,成本类别的选择是不一致的。间接成本是主要的成本驱动因素。在所有研究中,对成本的影响都存在很大的不确定性。结论由于影响很小,对成本的影响不确定,工作场所PA / SB干预的经济证据仍不清楚。需要进一步研究以确定有效的策略。应使用准则和经过验证的生产率成本标准制定此类干预措施的HEE。此外,由于PA / SB干预的回收期长,因此研究应对长期成本和效果进行建模。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号