首页> 外文期刊>SAGE Open >Recovery From Comorbidity: Depression or Anxiety With Alcohol Misusea??A Systematic and Integrative Supradisciplinary Review and Critical Appraisal
【24h】

Recovery From Comorbidity: Depression or Anxiety With Alcohol Misusea??A Systematic and Integrative Supradisciplinary Review and Critical Appraisal

机译:从合并症中康复:酒精滥用引起的抑郁或焦虑?系统,综合的超学科评价和严格评估

获取原文
       

摘要

Comorbidity among mood, anxiety, and alcohol disorders is common and burdensome, affecting individuals, families, and public health. A systematic and integrative review of the literature across disciplines and research methodologies was performed. Supradisciplinary approaches were applied to the review and the ensuing critical appraisal. Definitions, measurement, and estimation are controversial and inconstant. Recovery from comorbidity cannot be easily extricated from a sociocultural milieu. Methodological challenges in quantitative and qualitative research and across disciplines are many and are discussed. The evidence supporting current treatments is sparse and short-term, and modalities operating in isolation typically fail. People easily fall into the cracks between mental health and addiction services. Clinicians feel untrained and consumers bear the brunt of this: Judgmental and moralistic interactions persist and comorbidity is unrecognized in high-risk populations. Competing historical paradigms of mental illness and addiction present a barrier to progress and reductionism is an impediment to care and an obstacle to the integration and interpretation of research. What matters to consumers is challenging to quantify but worth considering: Finding employment, safe housing, and meaning are crucial to recovery. Complex social networks and peer support in recovery are important but poorly understood. The focus on modalities of limited evidence or generalizability persists in literature and practice. We need to consider different combinations of comorbidity, transitions as opposed to dichotomies of use or illness, and explore the long-term view and emic perspectives.
机译:情绪,焦虑和酒精障碍之间的合并症是常见且繁重的,影响个人,家庭和公共健康。对跨学科和研究方法的文献进行了系统的综合审查。超学科方法被应用到审查和随后的严格评估中。定义,度量和估计是有争议的且不确定的。从合并症中恢复并不容易从社会文化环境中解脱出来。定量和定性研究以及跨学科的方法学挑战很多,并进行了讨论。支持当前治疗的证据很少而且是短期的,孤立运行的方式通常会失败。人们很容易陷入心理健康和成瘾服务之间的缝隙。临床医生感到自己没有受过训练,消费者首当其冲:在高风险人群中,判断性和道德互动仍然存在,合并症并未得到认可。竞争的精神疾病和成瘾的历史范式构成了进步和还原主义的障碍,这是护理的障碍,也是研究的整合和解释的障碍。对消费者而言重要的事情是量化挑战,但值得考虑:找到工作,安全住房和意义对于复苏至关重要。复杂的社交网络和同行对恢复的支持很重要,但了解甚少。在文献和实践中,对有限证据或可概括性的方式的关注一直存在。我们需要考虑合并症,过渡方式(而不是使用或疾病的二分法)的不同组合,并探讨长期观点和主观观点。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号