首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Classifying GBL: Severity And Attrition. Is There Enough Bone To Reconstruct The Glenoid?
【24h】

Classifying GBL: Severity And Attrition. Is There Enough Bone To Reconstruct The Glenoid?

机译:GBL的分类:严重程度和损耗。有足够的骨头来重建关节盂吗?

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Objectives: Glenoid bone loss (GBL) continues to be a challenge in the management of recurrent anterior shoulder instability. Although the location of and percentage of GBL has been described, there is little information on how much bone is left to reconstruct the glenoid. Thus, the objective of this study is to describe a new GBL classification system that accounts for type of bone defect, amount of attritional loss, and correlate this to age, total time of instability and number of instability events. Methods: A total of 140 patients with recurrent anterior instability underwent an analysis of computed tomography (CT) three-dimensional imaging to assess GBL. The glenoid bone fragment was digitally analyzed (Osirix, Adobe) to qualitatively and quantitatively stratifyeach patient based upon attrition into- Type I “minimal atrittional” (no attrition -33%), Type II “partial attritional” (34 - 66%), and Type III “severe attritional” (67% - complete attrition). Additionally, demographic variables of age, total time of instability, and number of instability events were correlated to type of bone loss. Results: Patients had a mean age of 30.6 (range: 20 - 54) with a demonstrated mean GBL of 16.5% (range 5.1 - 62.3). Furthermore, the mean size of the remaining glenoid bone fragment was 27.8% of the full fragment size. Of 140 participants, 12 had attritional bone loss classified as Type I (12/140 = 8.6% of patients), 45 as Type II (45/140 = 32.1%), and 83 as Type III (83/140 = 59.3%). The mean percent loss for these three categories was 22.2%, 54.4%, and 88.5% respectively. Longer time of instability and more dislocations were associated with type III bone loss, and higher attrition of bone loss. Conclusion: This study highlights that GBL presents in a highly attritional nature and one should be cognizant that the remaining bone fragment does not come close to reconstituting glenoid bone stock. Patients with recurrent instability are predominantly severe attritional (Type III).
机译:目标:类固醇骨量丢失(GBL)仍然是复发性前肩关节不稳的治疗中的挑战。尽管已经描述了GBL的位置和百分比,但是关于剩余多少骨来重建关节盂的信息很少。因此,本研究的目的是描述一种新的GBL分类系统,该系统考虑了骨缺损的类型,磨损量,并将其与年龄,总的不稳定性时间和不稳定性事件的数量相关。方法:总共140例复发性前路不稳患者接受了计算机断层扫描(CT)三维成像分析以评估GBL。对关节盂骨碎片进行数字分析(Osirix,Adobe),以基于I型“最小减员”(无减损-33%),II型“部分减损”(34-66%)进行定性和定量分层。第三类“严重磨损”(67%-完全磨损)。此外,年龄,不稳定性总时间和不稳定性事件的人口统计学变量与骨丢失的类型相关。结果:患者的平均年龄为30.6(范围:20-54),已证实的平均GBL为16.5%(范围为5.1-62.3)。此外,剩余关节盂骨碎片的平均大小为完整碎片大小的27.8%。在140名参与者中,有12名患有I型骨丢失(12/140 = 8.6%的患者),45名是II型(45/140 = 32.1%)和83名是III型(83/140 = 59.3%) 。这三个类别的平均损失百分比分别为22.2%,54.4%和88.5%。较长时间的不稳定性和更多的脱位与III型骨丢失和更高的骨丢失损耗有关。结论:这项研究强调了GBL具有高度的磨擦性,应该认识到剩余的骨碎片与重建关节盂骨储备并不接近。复发性不稳定患者主要是严重的磨损(III型)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号