首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >The Effectiveness of a 6-Week Intervention Program Aimed at Modifying Running Style in Patients With Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome
【24h】

The Effectiveness of a 6-Week Intervention Program Aimed at Modifying Running Style in Patients With Chronic Exertional Compartment Syndrome

机译:旨在改善慢性运动隔室综合征患者跑步方式的六周干预计划的有效性

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Background: Previous studies have reported on the promising effects of changing running style in patients with chronic exertional compartment syndrome (CECS) using a 6-week training program aimed at adopting a forefoot strike technique. This study expands that work by comparing a 6-week in-house, center-based run training program with a less extensive, supervised, home-based run training program (50% home training). Hypothesis: An alteration in running technique will lead to improvements in CECS complaints and running performance, with the less supervised program producing less dramatic results. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Nineteen patients with CECS were prospectively enrolled. Postrunning intracompartmental pressure (ICP), run performance, and self-reported questionnaires were taken for all patients at baseline and after 6 weeks of running intervention. Questionnaires were also taken from 14 patients (7 center-based, 6 home-based) 4 months posttreatment. Results: Significant improvement between preintervention and postintervention rates was found for running distance (43%), ICP values (36%), and scores on the questionnaires Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE; 36%), Lower Leg Outcome Survey (LLOS; 18%), and Patient Specific Complaints (PSC; 60%). The mean posttreatment score on the Global Rating of Change (GROC) was between +4 and +5 (“somewhat better” to “moderately better”). In 14 participants (74%), no elevation of pain was reported posttreatment, compared with 3 participants (16%) at baseline; in all these cases, the running test was aborted because of a lack of cardiorespiratory fitness. Self-reported scores continued to improve 4 months after the end of the intervention program, with mean improvement rates of 48% (SANE), 26% (LLOS), and 81% (PSC). The mean GROC score improved to +6 points (“a great deal better”). Conclusion: In 19 patients diagnosed with CECS, a 6-week forefoot running intervention performed in both a center-based and home-based training setting led to decreased postrunning lower leg ICP values, improved running performances, and self-assessed leg condition. The influence of training group was not statistically significant. Overall, this is a promising finding, taking into consideration the significantly reduced investments in time and resources needed for the home-based program.
机译:背景:先前的研究报道了采用为期6周的旨在采用前掌打击技术的训练计划,改变跑步方式对慢性劳累性室间隔综合征(CECS)的潜在影响。这项研究通过比较为期6周的内部,基于中心的跑步训练计划与不太广泛,受监督的基于家庭的跑步训练计划(50%的家庭训练)来扩展这项工作。假设:运行技术的改变将导致CECS投诉和运行性能的改善,而受到较少监督的程序将产生较小的戏剧性结果。研究设计:队列研究;证据等级,3。方法:前瞻性纳入19例CECS患者。在基线时和运行干预后6周,对所有患者进行了运行后室内压力(ICP),运行性能和自我报告的问卷调查。在治疗后4个月,还从14例患者(7名以中心为中心,6名以家庭为中心)中进行了问卷调查。结果:在跑步距离(43%),ICP值(36%)和问卷单项评估数字评估(SANE; 36%),小腿结局调查(LLOS; 18)的得分上,干预前和干预后率之间有显着改善。 %)和患者特定投诉(PSC; 60%)。全球变化评估(GROC)的平均治疗后评分在+4到+5之间(“好一些”至“中度更好”)。在14名参与者(74%)中,治疗后没有疼痛加剧的报道,而基线时有3名参与者(16%)。在所有这些情况下,由于缺乏心肺功能,跑步测试被中止。干预计划结束后的四个月,自我报告的分数继续提高,平均改善率分别为48%(SANE),26%(LLOS)和81%(PSC)。 GROC平均得分提高到+6分(“好得多”)。结论:在19名被诊断为CECS的患者中,在基于中心的训练和基于家庭的训练中进行了为期6周的前足奔跑干预,导致跑步后小腿ICP值降低,跑步性能得到改善以及腿部自我评估。训练组的影响没有统计学意义。总体而言,考虑到家庭计划所需的时间和资源的大量减少,这是一个令人鼓舞的发现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号