首页> 外文期刊>Osteopathic Medicine and Primary Care >The epidemiology and medical management of low back pain during ambulatory medical care visits in the United States
【24h】

The epidemiology and medical management of low back pain during ambulatory medical care visits in the United States

机译:美国门诊就诊时腰痛的流行病学和医疗管理

获取原文
       

摘要

Background Low back pain (LBP) is a common symptom. Methods Patient visits attributed to LBP in the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) during 2003–2004 served as the basis for epidemiological analyses (n = 1539). The subset of patient visits in which LBP was the primary reason for seeking care (primary LBP patient visits) served as the basis for medical management analyses (n = 1042). National population estimates were derived using statistical weighting techniques. Results There were 61.7 million (SE, 4.0 million) LBP patient visits and 42.4 million (SE, 3.1 million) primary LBP patient visits. Only 55% of LBP patient visits were provided by primary care physicians. Age, geographic region, chronicity of symptoms, injury, type of physician provider, and physician specialty were associated with LBP patient visits. Age, injury, primary care physician status, type of physician provider, and shared physician care were associated with chronicity of LBP care. Osteopathic physicians were more likely than allopathic physicians to provide medical care during LBP patient visits (odds ratio [OR], 2.61; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75–3.92) and chronic LBP patient visits (OR, 4.39; 95% CI, 2.47–7.80). Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and narcotic analgesics were ordered during 14.2 million (SE, 1.2 million) and 10.5 million (SE, 1.1 million) primary LBP patient visits, respectively. Drugs (OR, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.13–0.62) and, specifically, NSAIDs (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.25–0.64) were ordered less often during chronic LBP patient visits compared with acute LBP patient visits. Overall, osteopathic physicians were less likely than allopathic physicians to order NSAIDs for LBP (OR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24–0.76). Almost two million surgical procedures were ordered, scheduled, or performed during primary LBP patient visits. Conclusion The percentage of LBP visits provided by primary care physicians in the United States remains suboptimal. Medical management of LBP, particularly chronic LBP, appears to over-utilize surgery relative to more conservative measures such as patient counseling, non-narcotic analgesics, and other drug therapies. Osteopathic physicians are more likely to provide LBP care, and less likely to use NSAIDs during such visits, than their allopathic counterparts. In general, LBP medical management does not appear to be in accord with evidence-based guidelines.
机译:背景腰痛(LBP)是常见症状。方法2003-2004年国家门诊医疗调查(NAMCS)中归因于LBP的患者就诊是流行病学分析的基础(n = 1539)。 LBP是寻求就医的主要原因的患者就诊子集(主要LBP患者就诊)成为医疗管理分析的基础(n = 1042)。全国人口估计数是使用统计加权技术得出的。结果有6170万(SE,400万)LBP患者就诊和4240万(SE,310万)LBP患者就诊。初级保健医生仅提供55%的LBP患者就诊。年龄,地理区域,症状的慢性,损伤,医生提供者的类型和医生专科都与LBP患者就诊有关。年龄,伤害,基层医疗医师的身份,医师提供者的类型以及共同的医师护理与LBP护理的长期性有关。骨科医师比同种疗法医师更有可能在LBP患者就诊期间(赔率[OR],2.61; 95%置信区间[CI],1.75-3.92)和慢性LBP患者就诊(OR,4.39; 95%CI)提供医疗服务,2.47–7.80)。在初次LBP患者就诊时,分别订购了1420万(SE,120万)和1050万(SE,110万)非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)和麻醉性镇痛药。与慢性LBP患者就诊相比,慢性LBP患者就诊时订购药物(OR为0.29; 95%CI为0.13-0.62),尤其是NSAID(OR为0.40; 95%CI为0.25-0.64)。总体而言,骨科医师比同种疗法医师订购LBP的NSAID的可能性较小(OR,0.43; 95%CI,0.24-0.76)。在初次LBP患者就诊期间,已下达,安排或执行了将近200万例外科手术。结论在美国,初级保健医生提供的LBP访视百分比仍然不理想。与相对保守的措施(例如患者咨询,非麻醉镇痛药和其他药物治疗)相比,LBP(尤其是慢性LBP)的医疗管理似乎过度利用了手术。与同种疗法的同伴相比,整骨疗法的医师更可能提供LBP护理,并且在此类就诊期间使用NSAID的可能性较小。通常,LBP医疗管理似乎不符合循证指南。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号