首页> 外文期刊>Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine >Isokinetic Strength Deficit 6 Months After Adductor Canal Blockade for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
【24h】

Isokinetic Strength Deficit 6 Months After Adductor Canal Blockade for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

机译:在前交叉韧带重建术的引流管阻塞后六个月,等速肌力不足

获取原文
           

摘要

Background:Recent evidence shows a delayed return to sport in children and delayed quadriceps recovery in both adults and children who have undergone anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with concomitant femoral nerve blockade (FNB) compared with those who had no blockade. We evaluated the use of adductor canal blockade (ACB), as an alternative to FNB, at the time of ACL reconstruction.Hypothesis:Patients who receive ACB will have greater isokinetic strength at 6 months postoperative compared with patients who receive FNB at the time of ACL reconstruction.Study Design:Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods:A retrospective record review was performed at a single academic medical center to identify all patients aged ≥16 years who had undergone ACL reconstruction with blockade between January 2010 and January 2015. Exclusion criteria included (1) non–sports medicine fellowship–trained surgeon performing the procedure, (2) continuous nerve catheter or concurrent epidural used, (3) revision ACL reconstruction or multiligament reconstruction as the index procedure, (4) previous contralateral ACL reconstruction, (5) concurrent microfracture, and (6) additional surgery within the 6-month outcome period that affected recovery. Isokinetic strength testing was performed using a computerized dynamometer, measuring total work at fast speed and peak torque at slow speed at 6 months; results were evaluated as a percentage of the nonoperative side. Multivariate regression analysis was used to evaluate the effect of block type on isokinetic strength outcome variables, controlling for age, sex, body mass index, graft type, and surgeon.Results:There were 230 patients receiving FNB and 30 patients receiving ACB included in the study. The multivariate regression analysis identified a greater side-to-side deficit in extension total work for the ACB group compared with the FNB group (P = .040), after controlling for age, sex, body mass index, graft type, and surgeon.Conclusion:Compared with FNB, ACB for ACL reconstruction is associated with a persistent fast-activation isokinetic strength deficit at 6 months after surgery. This is the first study to compare FNB to ACB, and results are concerning for patients planning an early return to sport.
机译:背景:最近的证据表明,与未进行股神经阻滞(FNB)重建的儿童相比,成人和经过前交叉韧带(ACL)重建并伴有股神经阻滞(FNB)的儿童和成年人的四头肌恢复延迟。我们假设在ACL重建时使用内收管阻滞(ACB)替代FNB。假说:接受ACB的患者术后6个月的等速肌力比接受FNB的患者更高ACL重建。研究设计:队列研究;证据级别,3。方法:在一个学术医学中心进行回顾性记录审查,以鉴定所有≥16岁的患者,这些患者在2010年1月至2015年1月之间进行了ACL重建并发生了阻塞。排除标准包括(1)非运动医学研究员培训的外科医师,执行该程序,(2)使用连续神经导管或硬膜外并发硬膜外,(3)修订ACL重建或多韧带重建作为指标程序,(4)先前对侧ACL重建,(5)并发微骨折,以及(6)在6个月的预后期内进行的其他手术影响了恢复。使用计算机测功机进行等速强度测试,在6个月时测量高速下的总功和低速下的峰值扭矩。将结果评估为非手术侧的百分比。多因素回归分析用于评估阻滞类型对等速肌力结局变量的影响,控制年龄,性别,体重指数,移植物类型和外科医生。结果:该组包括230名接受FNB的患者和30名接受ACB的患者。研究。多元回归分析表明,在控制了年龄,性别,体重指数,移植物类型和外科医生之后,ACB组与FNB组相比,在扩展总功方面存在较大的并列缺陷(P = .040)。结论:与FNB相比,ACB重建ACL与术后6个月持续快速激活等速肌力缺乏有关。这是将FNB与ACB进行比较的第一项研究,其结果与计划尽早恢复运动的患者有关。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号