...
首页> 外文期刊>Open access Journal of Sports Medicine >Pre- and postmarathon training habits of nonelite runners
【24h】

Pre- and postmarathon training habits of nonelite runners

机译:非精英选手马拉松前后的训练习惯

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Background: Despite the increasing popularity of marathons, little research has examined the training habits of nonelite marathon runners. Given that nonelite runners, particularly those with a competitive motive, have a higher risk for injury than experienced elite runners, it is important for physicians to understand the training program and features that might distinguish running performance and injury rates in this population.Hypothesis: We hypothesized that nonelite runners who qualify for the Boston Marathon (“qualifiers”) would have higher running volumes, more running sessions per week, lower injury rates, and lower body mass index (BMI) than nonqualifying runners.Study design: A cross-sectional Web-based survey of runners (convenience sample) at 1 month (n = 50) and 6 months (n = 41) after participation in the 2008 Twin Cities Marathon (TCM) that acquired data on anthropometric measures, demographic data, finishing time, premarathon/current training program, and self-reported injury.Results: Thirteen of 50 initial survey respondents were classified as a “qualifier” based on their finishing time. Mean BMI was significantly lower in the qualifiers at 1 month (22.0 versus 23.9 kg/m2, P = 0.0267) but not 6 months postmarathon. There were no significant differences in training volume (running frequency, run length, or cross-training volume) or injury rates between qualifiers and nonqualifiers. Prior to the 2008 TCM, 54% of runners included cross-training in their exercise program, which increased significantly to 74% 1 month postmarathon (P = 0.0039) and 71% 6 months postmarathon (P = 0.0325). There was no association between cross-training and injury rates.Conclusions: Nonelite marathon runners had a high degree of cross-training in their training program. Qualifiers for the Boston Marathon did not significantly differ in running frequency, run length, or cross-training volume compared with nonqualifiers. Whether changes in the training program at an individual level might facilitate a change in qualifying status remains to be determined.
机译:背景:尽管马拉松运动越来越流行,但很少有研究检查非精英马拉松运动员的训练习惯。鉴于非精英跑步者(尤其是具有竞争动机的跑步者)比有经验的精英跑步者受伤的风险更高,因此对于医生而言,了解可能区分该人群跑步表现和受伤率的训练计划和功能非常重要。假设有资格参加波士顿马拉松比赛(“资格赛”)的非精英运动员比不合格的运动员具有更高的跑步量,每周更多的跑步次数,更低的受伤率和更低的体重指数(BMI)。研究设计:横断面在参加2008年双城马拉松(TCM)后的1个月(n = 50)和6个月(n = 41)时,对跑步者(便利性样本)进行基于网络的调查,该调查获得了人体测量数据,人口统计数据,完成时间,结果:在50名初始调查的受访者中,有13名根据完成时间被归类为“合格者”。资格赛第一个月的平均BMI显着降低(22.0对23.9 kg / m2,P = 0.0267),但马拉松后6个月没有。合格者与非合格者之间的训练量(跑步频率,跑步时间或交叉训练量)或伤害率没有显着差异。在2008年中医训练之前,有54%的跑步者在他们的运动计划中加入了交叉训练,这在马拉松赛后1个月(P = 0.0039)和71%马拉松后6个月(P = 0.0325)显着增加。交叉训练与受伤率之间没有关联。结论:Nonelite马拉松运动员在其训练计划中具有高度的交叉训练。与非资格赛相比,波士顿马拉松的资格赛在跑步频率,跑步时间或交叉训练量上没有显着差异。在个人层面上改变培训计划是否可能会促进资格状态的改变尚待确定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号