首页> 外文期刊>Open Access Library Journal >Rice Yield Gap Minimization in Central Bangladesh: Using and Adapting Existing Technologies
【24h】

Rice Yield Gap Minimization in Central Bangladesh: Using and Adapting Existing Technologies

机译:孟加拉国中部的水稻产量差距最小化:使用和适应现有技术

获取原文
       

摘要

Rice ( Oryza sativa L.) in the dry season (Boro) followed by rice in the wet season (Aman) is the major cereal cropping system in Bangladesh. The average productivity (7 Mg·ha ~( ﹣1 ) ) of this system is far below attainable yields (14 Mg·ha ~( ﹣1 ) ) in farmers’ fields, resulting in a large yield gap mainly due to farmers’ traditional management practices. Narrowing yield gap is a vital complementary strategy in improving rice yield and consequently enhancing food security. We evaluated BRRI recommended management practices, BRRI recommended management practices along with two N management options (leaf color chart and Urea Super Granule) and farmers’ crop management practices integrated with quality seed, leaf color chart (LCC) and Urea Super Granule (USG) in farmers’ fields of Kapasia, Gazipur over 6 contiguous seasons during 2009-2012. Across years, all the management options increased grain yields compared with the farmers’ practice (FP) by 1.12 Mg·ha ~( ﹣1 ) in Aman and 0.84 Mg·ha ~( ﹣1 ) in Boro season. The higher yield response (43%) occurred with BRRI recommended management practices followed by BRRI recommended management practices in combination with Urea Super Granule (42%) as N source (BRRI-USG). Yield advantage of 41% could be attained by BRRI recommended management practices with leaf color chart (LCC) aided N management (BRRI-LCC) while this was 22%, 13% and 13% higher than FP (farmer’s practice) when only quality seeds, USG and LCC were used with farmers’ management practice. BRRI Rec., BRRI-LCC and BRRI-USG·management options reduce the yield gap of FP by 41%, with an average of 2.87 Mg·ha ~( ﹣1 ) . When farmers adopted FP-QS, FP-USG and FP-LCC management options, they reduced the yield gap of FP by 21%, 13% and 12%, with an average of 1.49, 0.88 and 0.81 Mg·ha ~( ﹣1 ) , respectively. The average added net returns with BRRI Rec., BRRI-LCC and BRRI-USG·management options were US$175 to US$362 ha ~( ﹣1 ) in the wet season and US $158 to US $263 ha ~( ﹣1 ) in the dry season. BRRI management practices and BRRI management practices integrated with two N management options, either LCC or USG has the potential to boost rice yield and consequently total rice production in Bangladesh.
机译:旱季(Boro)的水稻(Oryza sativa L.),雨季(Aman)的水稻,其次是孟加拉国的主要谷物种植系统。该系统的平均生产力(7 Mg·ha〜(﹣1))远远低于农民田间可获得的单产(14 Mg·ha〜(﹣1)),导致较大的产量差距主要是由于农民的传统管理实践。缩小产量差距是提高稻米产量并因此加强粮食安全的重要补充战略。我们评估了BRRI建议的管理实践,BRRI建议的管理实践以及两个N管理选项(叶色图和尿素超级颗粒)以及结合了优质种子,叶色图(LCC)和尿素超级颗粒(USG)的农户作物管理实践在2009-2012年的6个连续季节中,在加兹普尔(Kapasia)的农民土地上种植。多年来,与农民的实践相比,所有管理选择都使谷物单产提高了(Aman)1.12 Mg·ha〜(﹣1),在Boro季节提高了0.84 Mg·ha〜(﹣1)。 BRRI建议的管理方法产生更高的产量响应(43%),随后BRRI建议的管理方法与尿素超级颗粒(42%)结合作为氮源(BRRI-USG)。 BRRI建议的叶色图(LCC)辅助氮管理(BRRI-LCC)建议的管理实践可实现41%的增产优势,而仅使用优质种子,这比FP(农民的实践)分别高22%,13%和13% ,USG和LCC用于农民的管理实践。 BRRI Rec。,BRRI-LCC和BRRI-USG·管理选项将FP的产量差距降低了41%,平均为2.87 Mg·ha〜(﹣1)。当农民采用FP-QS,FP-USG和FP-LCC管理方案时,他们将FP的产量差距减少了21%,13%和12%,平均减少了1.49、0.88和0.81 Mg·ha〜(﹣1 ) , 分别。 BRRI Rec。,BRRI-LCC和BRRI-USG·管理选项的平均增加净收益在雨季为175美元至362公顷〜(﹣1),在雨季为158美元至263美元〜(﹣1)。旱季。 BRRI管理实践和BRRI管理实践与LN或USG两种N管理选项相结合,有可能提高稻米产量,从而提高孟加拉国的稻米总产量。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号