首页> 外文期刊>Oman Journal of Ophthalmology >Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth
【24h】

Interobserver reliability when using the Van Herick method to measure anterior chamber depth

机译:使用Van Herick方法测量前房深度时的观察者间可靠性

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction: The Van Herick method is a quick and easy way to estimate anterior chamber depth, which allows grading of patients according to the likelihood of having primary acute closed-angle glaucoma. However, as the test is highly subjective, measurements and thus grading may vary between observers. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the degree of variation of Van Herick scores among observers and to investigate agreement between temporal and nasal scores. Materials and Methods: A total of 15 observers measured the temporal and nasal Van Herick scores from 18 patients, grouped into cohorts at outpatient glaucoma and corneal clinic. Analysis of data involved assigning a patient to a Van Herick grade based on the median score and then determining the mean standard deviation and percentage consistency for each grade. Results: We found that Grades 1 and 4 had a high mean percentage consistency (80% and 84.6%, respectively) and a low mean standard deviation (0.45 and 0.26, respectively). Grades 2 and 3 had low mean percentage consistencies (57.5 and 5, respectively) and high mean standard deviations (0.71 and 0.89, respectively). The temporal and nasal scores showed good agreement (κ = 0.61P Conclusion: The Van Herick score has a good interobserver reliability for Grades 1 and 4; however, Grades 2 and 3 require further tests such as gonioscopy or ocular coherence tomography. Temporal and nasal scores demonstrated good agreement; therefore, if the nasal score cannot be measured due to nasal bridge size, the temporal can be used as an approximation.
机译:简介:Van Herick方法是一种快速简便的方法来评估前房深度,该方法可根据原发性急性闭角型青光眼的可能性对患者进行分级。但是,由于测试是高度主观的,因此观察者之间的测量结果和评分可能会有所不同。目的:本研究的目的是调查观察者之间的Van Herick评分差异程度,并调查颞和鼻评分之间的一致性。资料和方法:共有15位观察者对18位患者的颞和鼻Van Herick评分进行了测量,这些患者分为门诊青光眼和角膜诊所的队列。数据分析涉及根据中位数为患者分配Van Herick评分,然后确定每个评分的平均标准偏差和百分比一致性。结果:我们发现1级和4级具有较高的平均百分比一致性(分别为80%和84.6%)和较低的平均标准偏差(分别为0.45和0.26)。等级2和3具有较低的平均百分比一致性(分别为57.5和5)和较高的平均标准偏差(分别为0.71和0.89)。颞侧和鼻侧评分显示出良好的一致性(κ= 0.61P结论:Van Herick评分在1级和4级之间具有良好的观察者间信度;但是,2级和3级需要进一步的检查,如角膜镜检查或眼相断层扫描。分数显示出良好的一致性;因此,如果由于鼻梁的大小而无法测量鼻分数,则可以将颞骨的分数用作近似值。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号