首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Soil Science >Comparison and Evaluation of Two Analytical Methods for Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage of Five Soil Types in Central Sudan
【24h】

Comparison and Evaluation of Two Analytical Methods for Cation Exchange Capacity and Exchangeable Sodium Percentage of Five Soil Types in Central Sudan

机译:苏丹中部五种土壤类型的阳离子交换容量和交换钠含量的两种分析方法的比较和评价

获取原文
           

摘要

Twenty-six soil samples were collected from five soil profiles at different climatological and ecological regions in central Sudan. Soil profile was dug in each studied area and morphological profile description was carried out for different horizons. All samples were analyzed using two different methods to determine Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC) and exchangeable sodium percentage (ESP). Statistical analysis (T-test) was used in order to investigate the differences between soil samples for the studied locations. Significant differences appeared when compared the two methods for CEC determination at Gedaref area, Wad Medani and Nile flood plain and that appeared in evaluation of ESP at Nile flood plain and Shambat area. The results also revealed that, the developed method used in this study was more practical, simple and reliable for determination of CEC and ESP as the currently used in most soil laboratories. In addition, it will be safer than the other methods in some problematic soils. The adoption of this developed method is advisable because it is less time consuming as it omits the washing step. In contrast, the old method cannot be a good substitute in laboratories which have no possibility to determine sodium by using flame photometer. We conclude that when the developed method is used to determine CEC and ESP time will be saved, that fewer amounts of chemicals will be used and that accurate results will be achieved.
机译:从苏丹中部不同气候和生态区域的五个土壤剖面收集了26个土壤样品。在每个研究区域挖掘土壤剖面,并对不同层位进行形态剖面描述。使用两种不同的方法对所有样品进行了分析,以确定阳离子交换容量(CEC)和可交换钠百分比(ESP)。为了研究所研究位置的土壤样本之间的差异,使用了统计分析(T检验)。比较Gedaref地区的两种CEC测定方法Wad Medani和Nile洪泛区,以及在Nile洪泛区和Shambat地区的ESP评估中,发现了显着差异。结果还表明,该研究中使用的已开发方法对于大多数土壤实验室中目前使用的CEC和ESP的测定更为实用,简单和可靠。此外,在某些有问题的土壤中,它比其他方法更安全。建议采用这种改进的方法,因为它省去了洗涤步骤,因此耗时少。相反,在无法使用火焰光度计测定钠的实验室中,旧方法不能很好地替代。我们得出的结论是,当使用开发的方法确定CEC和ESP时间时,将节省使用的化学品数量,并且将获得准确的结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号