首页> 外文期刊>Oman Journal of Ophthalmology >Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking
【24h】

Contact lens fitting after corneal collagen cross-linking

机译:角膜胶原交联后的隐形眼镜验配

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND: Contact lenses (CLs) remain the mainstay in improving vision in patients having keratoconus. With corneal collagen cross-linking (CXL) performed worldwide, whether the same CLs can be used or needs replacement needed to be assessed and considered. AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the changes in CL fitting following CXL. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: This is a retrospective study conducted at a tertiary center. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We analyzed the medical records of patients who underwent CXL and used CL. Data collected included demographics, pre- and post-CXL refraction, corneal topography, anterior-segment examination, and CL [rigid gas permeable(RGP)] fitting details and duration between CXL and RGP fitting. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Descriptive analysis and paired t-test were used to compare the pre- and post-CXL data on refraction, visual acuity, and CL parameters. The statistical significance was kept at P 0.05. RESULTS: Thirty-four eyes (keratoconus = 32, pellucid marginal degeneration = 1, and post-LASIK ectasia = 1) of 27 patients who used CL before and after undergoing CXL were analyzed. Mean duration between CXL and RGP lens use was 2.53 months. Mean sphere and cylinder post-CXL was ?4.11 ± 4.32 D and ?3.54 ± 2.51 D, respectively. A mean change of 0.75 ± 3.72 D sphere and 0.71 ± 3.39 D cylinder was noted post-CXL. The post-CXL best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (CVA) was 0.52 ± 0.36 and with RGP lens it was 0.09 ± 0.18. There was no significant difference in pre- and post-CXL RGP lens CVA (0.07 ± 0.09 and 0.09 ± 0.18, respectively; P = 0.556). Pre-CXL, 3-point-touch fitting was in 24 eyes (70.59%) and central fluorescein pooling was in 10 eyes (29.41%). Post-CXL, 30 eyes (88.24%) had 3-point-touch and central fluorescein pooling was found in four eyes (11.76%). One patient had CL intolerance after CXL. Of the 32 keratoconus eyes, 62.5% (n = 20 eyes) were prescribed new lenses; 37.5% (n = 12 eyes) continued using own lenses. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in refraction, topography indices, and RGP lens parameters pre- and post-CXL. However, changes in RGP lens fitting characteristics suggest a possible change in shape or apex location of the cornea after CXL. RGP lenses remain the best option to improve visual acuity after CXL in corneal ectasia.
机译:背景:角膜接触镜(CLs)仍然是改善圆锥角膜患者视力的主要手段。在全球范围内进行角膜胶原蛋白交联(CXL)时,是否可以使用相同的CL还是需要评估和考虑是否需要更换。目的:本研究的目的是评估CXL后CL拟合的变化。场所和设计:这是在第三中心进行的一项回顾性研究。受试者和方法:我们分析了接受CXL并使用CL的患者的病历。收集的数据包括人口统计资料,CXL前后的折射,角膜地形图,前段检查以及CL [刚性气体可渗透(RGP)]拟合细节以及CXL和RGP拟合之间的持续时间。统计分析:使用描述性分析和配对t检验比较CXL前后的屈光度,视敏度和CL参数数据。统计学显着性保持在P <0.05。结果:分析了27例在接受CXL前后使用CL的患者的34只眼(圆锥角膜= 32,透明边缘变性= 1,LASIK术后扩张= 1)。使用CXL和RGP镜片之间的平均持续时间为2.53个月。 CXL后的平均球体和圆柱体分别为?4.11±4.32 D和?3.54±2.51D。在CXL后记录到0.75±3.72 D球体和0.71±3.39 D圆柱体的平均变化。 CXL术后最佳眼镜矫正视力(CVA)为0.52±0.36,而使用RGP镜片为0.09±0.18。 CXL之前和之后的RGP晶状体CVA没有显着差异(分别为0.07±0.09和0.09±0.18; P = 0.556)。 CXL前,3点触摸式验光在24眼中(占70.59%),中央荧光素合并在10眼中(占29.41%)。 CXL后,有30只眼(88.24%)进行了三点触摸,并且在四只眼(11.76%)中发现了中央荧光素池。一名患者在CXL后出现CL不耐受。在32只圆锥角膜眼中,有62.5%(n = 20只眼)被指定为新晶状体;继续使用自己的镜片的比例为37.5%(n = 12眼)。结论:在CXL前后,折射率,地形指数和RGP镜片参数均无显着差异。但是,RGP晶状体装配特性的变化表明CXL后角膜的形状或顶点位置可能发生变化。 RGP镜片仍然是改善CXL后角膜扩张的视力的最佳选择。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号