...
首页> 外文期刊>OLA Quarterly >But How Do We Do Critical Librarianship?
【24h】

But How Do We Do Critical Librarianship?

机译:但是,我们如何进行重要的图书馆工作?

获取原文

摘要

Critical librarianship asks us to look more closely at the sociopolitical world both inside and out of our libraries. Indeed, a lot has happened in the world since I first saw the call for this special issue of OLA Quarterly. First, there was the exposure of an internal memo from a Google employee that denied that women were capable tech workers. Last week, there were escalating threats between Donald Trump and Kim Jong Un about possible nuclear detonations. I finished writing in the wake of white supremacist demonstrations and violence in Charlottesville, Virginia, and as an unprecedented storm geared up to hit Houston. On Twitter and Facebook, I’m seeing fierce debate about whether to let Nazis use library space … and how you would even be able to identify Nazis to kick them out. In short, this is an urgent time to reflect on what critical librarianship is and what its aims are. As the #critlib chats on Twitter have gained interest over the past few years, I have seen the “critical” of critical librarianship interpreted in several overlapping and competing ways. First, critical librarianship is associated, for good reason, with critical theory, or what Kenny Garcia calls a “critical theorist framework that is epistemological, self-reflective, and activist in nature” (2016). Critical theory encompasses the work of many scholars who reflect on and critique social structures. The call for this issue noted that critical librarianship has been criticized for being overly philosophical or theory-heavy. In the case of the #critlib chats, we wanted a place for librarians to talk about how they use critical pedagogy in particular, inspired by the work of Paulo Freire, bell hooks, and other scholars, as well as our own experiences as learners and teachers. Our emphasis, however, was on doing and how practice informed thinking, and in turn, how this new mode of thinking could influence new forms of practice. This spiraling transformative dialog between theory and practice can be described as praxis, and it requires an openness both to learning about new ideas and to try new things.
机译:批判性馆员制度要求我们更加仔细地研究图书馆内部和外部的社会政治世界。确实,自从我第一次看到这一期《 OLA季刊》的呼吁以来,世界上发生了很多事情。首先,有一位Google员工公开内部备忘录,该备忘录否认女性是有能力的技术工作者。上周,唐纳德·特朗普和金正恩之间关于可能的核爆炸的威胁不断升级。在弗吉尼亚州夏洛茨维尔举行白人至上主义示威和暴力活动之后,我写完了这篇文章,而这场空前的风暴正袭击休斯敦。在Twitter和Facebook上,我正在就是否让纳粹利用图书馆空间……以及您如何识别纳粹将他们踢出去等问题展开激烈的辩论。简而言之,这是一个刻不容缓的时机,需要反思什么是关键的图书馆事业及其目标。在过去几年中,随着Twitter上的#critlib聊天越来越引起人们的关注,我已经看到批评图书馆学的“批评”以几种重叠和竞争的方式进行了解释。首先,批判图书馆员工作有充分的理由与批判理论或肯尼·加西亚所说的“本质上是认识论,自我反省和积极主义者的批判理论家框架”相关联(2016年)。批判理论涵盖了许多对社会结构进行反思和批判的学者的工作。对这一问题的呼吁指出,批评性图书馆馆长因过于哲学或理论过多而受到批评。在#critlib聊天的情况下,我们希望图书馆员能有一个地方谈论他们如何利用批判教育法,特别是受到Paulo Freire,钟形挂钩和其他学者的工作的启发,以及我们作为学习者和学习者的经验教师。但是,我们的重点是做事,实践如何启发思维,以及反过来,这种新的思维方式如何影响新的实践形式。这种在理论与实践之间不断发展的螺旋式对话可以被描述为实践,它要求开放性既要学习新思想,又要尝试新事物。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号