首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Urology >The Clinical Effect of Bipolar Transurethral Resection in Saline of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia with Long Term Follow-Up
【24h】

The Clinical Effect of Bipolar Transurethral Resection in Saline of Benign Prostate Hyperplasia with Long Term Follow-Up

机译:长期随访双极经尿道电切术在盐水前列腺增生症中的临床效果

获取原文
           

摘要

Transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) is considered as the gold standard for the management of bladder outlet obstruction due to benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Long-term follow-up of the clinical effect of bipolar transurethral resection of the prostate (B-TURP) in saline for BPH is required. >Objective: To compare, with long term follow-up, the efficacy and safety of B-TURP in the treatment of BPH with prostate gland volumes of <45 ml, >45 ml, and larger than 60 ml. >Materials and Methods: From January 2006 to December 2016, 318 patients with a mean age of 69.45 ± 8.37 years and a median prostate volume of 42 cm3 (56.51 - 32.47) were treated with B-TURP by single urologist (SP) at the Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University. We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative status of patients’ status follow-up for at least 6 months and up to 5 years. Post-void residual (PVR) and maximum flow rate (Qmax) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively. Operative time, length of catheterization and hospitalization and complications were all reported. >Results: The main indication for B-TURP was failure of medication (81.13%). Perioperative results showed no statistical significance among the groups in terms of catheterization days and the hospitalization length. During the follow-up, the improvement of postoperative parameters was compared with preoperative subscales, at different periods from baseline and after 24, 36, 48, and 60 months post treatment. PSA, Q max, PVR, and average flow rate were significantly different from pre-operation data (p < 0.005). Regarding TURP complications, significant differences were observed in relation to transient incontinence (5.87%), urinary tract infection (2.5%), urinary retention/catheterization (1.57%), contracture of bladder neck (4.4%), urethral strictures (4.09%), recurrence of BPH (2.83%), hypotonic bladder (0.6%) and erectile dysfunction (7.8%). No TUR syndrome or secondary hemorrhage was recorded in the study. Interestingly, complications in patients on ongoing oral anticoagulation were not found. >Conclusion: With long-term follow-up, B-TURP is a safe and effective technique for BPH management with prostate gland < 45 ml, > 45 ml and larger than 60 ml.
机译:经尿道前列腺电切术(TURP)被认为是处理由于良性前列腺增生(BPH)引起的膀胱出口梗阻的金标准。需要对BPH在盐水中进行双极经尿道前列腺双极切除术(B-TURP)的临床效果的长期随访。 >目的:在长期随访中,比较B-TURP在前列腺体积小于45 ml,大于45 ml和大于60 ml的前列腺增生症中的疗效和安全性。 >材料和方法:从2006年1月到2016年12月,有318例患者的平均年龄为69.45±8.37岁,中位前列腺体积为42 cm 3 (56.51-32.47)由Mahidol大学Ramathibodi医院外科医学院泌尿外科的单位泌尿科医师(SP)用B-TURP进行治疗。我们回顾性分析了患者状态随访至少6个月至5年的围手术期状态。术前和术后评估无效后残留量(PVR)和最大流速(Qmax)。报道了手术时间,导管插入时间,住院时间和并发症。 >结果: B-TURP的主要适应症是药物治疗失败(81.13%)。围手术期结果显示,两组之间在导管插入天数和住院时间方面无统计学意义。在随访期间,在距基线不同的时间段以及治疗后24、36、48和60个月后,将术后参数的改善与术前子量表进行比较。 PSA,Q max,PVR和平均流速与术前数据有显着差异( p <0.005)。关于TURP并发症,在暂时性尿失禁(5.87%),尿路感染(2.5%),尿retention留/导管插入(1.57%),膀胱颈挛缩(4.4%),尿道狭窄(4.09%)方面观察到显着差异。 ,BPH复发(2.83%),低渗性膀胱(0.6%)和勃起功能障碍(7.8%)。研究中未记录TUR综合征或继发性出血。有趣的是,未发现患者正在进行口服抗凝治疗的并发症。 >结论:通过长期随访,B-TURP是一种安全有效的BPH管理技术,用于前列腺<45 ml,> 45 ml和大于60 ml的前列腺。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号