首页> 外文期刊>Oncology and Therapy >Effects of Initiating or Switching to a Six-Monthly Triptorelin Formulation on Prostate Cancer Patient–Healthcare Interactions and Hospital Resource Use: a Real-World, Retrospective, Non-Interventional Study
【24h】

Effects of Initiating or Switching to a Six-Monthly Triptorelin Formulation on Prostate Cancer Patient–Healthcare Interactions and Hospital Resource Use: a Real-World, Retrospective, Non-Interventional Study

机译:开始或转换为六个月的曲普瑞林制剂对前列腺癌患者与医疗保健的相互作用以及医院资源使用的影响:一项现实世界的回顾性非干预性研究

获取原文
       

摘要

Introduction Luteinising hormone-releasing hormone agonist (LHRHa) injections are currently used in the treatment of advanced prostate cancer, but the frequency of injections may represent a burden to patients and healthcare services. The aim of this study was to collect real-world evidence about clinical and practical outcomes for patients with prostate cancer initiating six-monthly triptorelin, or switching from shorter-acting formulations to six-monthly triptorelin, in hospitals in the DEcapeptyl SERVice Evaluation project. Methods Up to 2?years of data were collected retrospectively by physicians from records of 88 patients receiving six-monthly triptorelin at three centres. The primary outcome measure was the change in the number of patient–healthcare interactions (patient reviews, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) tests, and LHRHa injections) over a 24-month treatment period. Results This analysis included 47 patients newly initiated on six-monthly triptorelin and 41 who received 12?months of a one- or three-monthly LHRHa before switching to six-monthly triptorelin. After switching to six-monthly triptorelin, there was a statistically significant reduction in patient reviews (46.8%), injections (46.8%), and PSA tests (26.6%; all P ?0.0001). The total number of patient–healthcare interactions was significantly reduced (41.5%; P ?0.0001). Based upon cost of these interactions only, the cost reduction of switching to six-monthly triptorelin was £10,214.85 (£249.14 per patient) over 12?months. At 12?months, median PSA was 1.30?ng/mL (23.50?ng/mL at diagnosis) for newly treated patients and 0.24?ng/mL (0.35?ng/mL at switch) for patients who had switched treatment. No safety issues were identified. Conclusion Switching from one- or three-monthly LHRHa to six-monthly triptorelin significantly reduced patient–healthcare interactions and associated costs while maintaining PSA control over a 12-month treatment period. This not only translates into healthcare savings but may release men from the restriction of repeated healthcare interactions and thus improve the overall patient experience as the population of long-term prostate cancer survivors continues to increase. Funding Ipsen Limited.
机译:简介黄体激素释放激素激动剂(LHRHa)注射剂目前用于治疗晚期前列腺癌,但注射频率可能给患者和医疗服务带来负担。这项研究的目的是在DEcapeptyl SERVice评估项目中,为医院中开始每六个月服用曲普瑞林或从短效制剂转为六个月曲普瑞林的前列腺癌患者收集有关临床和实际结果的现实证据。方法医师回顾性地从三个中心的88例接受六个月曲普瑞林治疗的患者中收集了长达2年的数据。主要结果指标是在24个月的治疗期内患者与医疗保健互动次数(患者评价,前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测试和LHRHa注射)的变化。结果该分析包括47例刚开始每六个月服用曲普瑞林的患者和41例在转为六个月服用曲普瑞林之前接受12个月的一或三个月LHRHa治疗的患者。改用六个月的曲普瑞林后,患者复查(46.8%),注射剂(46.8%)和PSA测试(26.6%;所有P <0.0001)均有统计学意义的减少。患者与医疗保健互动的总数显着减少(41.5%; P <?0.0001)。仅根据这些相互作用的成本,在过去的12个月中,转换为六个月的曲普瑞林的成本降低了was10,214.85(每位患者£ 249.14)。在12个月时,接受新治疗的患者的PSA中位数为1.30?ng / mL(诊断时为23.50?ng / mL),对于接受过治疗的患者,中位PSA为0.24?ng / mL(转换时为0.35?ng / mL)。没有发现安全问题。结论从一个月或三个月的LHRHa切换到六个月的曲普瑞林,可以显着减少患者与医疗保健的互动和相关费用,同时在12个月的治疗期内保持PSA控制。这不仅可以节省医疗费用,而且可以使男性摆脱重复进行医疗保健互动的限制,从而随着长期前列腺癌幸存者人数的不断增加,改善了患者的整体体验。资助益普生有限公司。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号