首页> 外文期刊>Open Journal of Anesthesiology >The Readability of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Anesthesiology Associations and the American Society of Anesthesiologists
【24h】

The Readability of Online Patient Education Materials from Major Anesthesiology Associations and the American Society of Anesthesiologists

机译:主要麻醉学协会和美国麻醉医师学会在线患者教育材料的可读性

获取原文
           

摘要

Background: As much as 80% of US adults search online for health related information. The value of the information is limited by the patients’ ability to comprehend it. Despite the recommendation by the American Medical Association (AMA) to provide all patient education materials (PEMs) at a 6th grade reading level, many online sources do not conform. This study aims to evaluate the readability of PEMs from major online sources for anesthesiology. Methods: We determined the readability of PEMs from five major anesthesiology organizations and twelve brochures from the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) using ten validated readability scales. PEMs from the various anesthesiology websites were compiled into a single word document for analysis. The twelve patient education brochures from the ASA were downloaded and analyzed separately. We then grouped the twelve documents into one sample and compared it to the other anesthesiology association websites. Results: All of the PEMs provided by the ASA were determined to be higher than a 6th grade reading level with nine being at a 12th grade reading level or above. The PEMs of the five major anesthesiology association websites were beyond the 6th grade reading level with four out of five at greater than the 12th grade reading level. Conclusion: The results showed that the readability of PEMs provided by five major anesthesiology associations and the ASA was beyond the 6th grade. Therefore, the PEMs with improved readability in anesthesiology are needed.
机译:背景:多达80%的美国成年人在线搜索健康相关信息。信息的价值受到患者理解能力的限制。尽管美国医学协会(AMA)建议提供所有6年级阅读水平的患者教育材料(PEM),但许多在线资源并不符合。本研究旨在评估主要在线麻醉学来源的PEM的可读性。方法:我们使用十种经过验证的可读性量表,确定了来自五个主要麻醉学组织的PEM的可读性以及来自美国麻醉医师学会(ASA)的十二本小册子。来自各种麻醉学网站的PEM被编译成一个单词文档进行分析。 ASA的十二本患者教育手册已下载并分别进行了分析。然后,我们将这十二份文件分组为一个样本,并将其与其他麻醉学协会网站进行了比较。结果:确定由ASA提供的所有PEM都高于6年级阅读水平,其中9个处于12年级或更高的阅读水平。五个主要麻醉学协会网站的PEM超出了六年级的阅读水平,其中五分之四的水平高于十二年级的阅读水平。结论:结果表明,由五个主要麻醉学协会和ASA提供的PEM的可读性超过了6年级。因此,需要在麻醉学中具有提高的可读性的PEM。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号