首页> 外文期刊>Oeno One >Issues to be considered for strategic adaptation to climate evolution – is atmospheric evaporative demand changing?
【24h】

Issues to be considered for strategic adaptation to climate evolution – is atmospheric evaporative demand changing?

机译:战略性适应气候变化需要考虑的问题–大气蒸发需求是否正在变化?

获取原文
           

摘要

The predicted developments in climate are region-specific and adaptation can only be successful considering the regional characteristics with its diverse technical, environmental, economic and social implications. Beyond some obvious adaptation strategies in response to emerging environmental constraints for example there are many more “basic” challenges below “the surface”. One of the key concerns for many regions is the availability of water and how increasing temperature will drive the evaporative demand of the atmosphere. For this, individual regions need to be analysed to quantify possible associated risks. This paper will address differences in regional water relations of grape growing areas in different parts of the world as a basis to address the points listed above. Introduction Climate change effects on the terrestrial water cycle show regional differentiated patterns. While temperature is increasing in many world grape growing regions (Jones et al., 2005; Schultz and Jones, 2010; Webb et al., 2012; Hannah et al., 2013; Tóth and Végvári, 2016) precipitation patterns can vastly differ between regions and can show substantial temporal variations (between and within years) (IPCC, 2014). From rising temperatures it is mostly assumed that water holding capacity of the atmosphere will increase in the future as a function of the Clausius-Clapeyron law (Krysanova et al., 2008) which predicts an increase in the saturation vapour pressure of the atmosphere of 6-7% per degree Celsius. As a consequence, a simultaneous increase in potential evapotranspiration (the amount of water that could potentially be evaporated from soils and transpired by plants due to changes in climatic factors such as temperature, vapour pressure deficit, radiation and wind speed, ETp) is assumed in many cases, which would alter soil and plant water relations. However, the same underlying principles also predict an increase in precipitation by 1-2 % per degree warming (Farquhar and Roderick, 2007). Additionally, model predictions for many regions forecast altered precipitation patterns and thus in combination with the possibility of increased ETp, farmers around the world fear an increase in the likelyhood of water deficit and the availability of water for irrigation. However, the large spatial and temporal variability in precipitation patterns between regions preclude generalizations in predicted consequences with respect to soil and plant water status development. Especially the temporal variability may mask longer-term trends in the development of ETp and consequently soil and plant water status (van Leeuwen et al., 2010). Additionally, the focus on the developments within a growing season (spring-summer) in many studies may miss decisive effects occurring during the “off-season” (winter-early spring) but having substantial carry-over effects into the season. Evaporation is driven by changes in temperature, humidity, solar radiation and wind speed and contrary to expectations due to climatic changes, there have been reports on a reduction in evaporative demand worldwide (Farquhar and Roderick, 2007). In many cases this has been related to a decrease in solar radiation observed for many areas on earth including wine growing regions in Europe until the beginning of the 80th (global dimming, (Wild et al., 2005; Hofmann and Schultz, 2010)) of the last century. However, ETp in some areas has continuously increased which suggests that changes in the aerodynamic component must have more than offset the decrease in radiation over that part of the observed time span (Schultz and Hofmann, 2016). For some regions in Germany, wind speed and vapour pressure deficit (VPD) of the atmosphere have increased in the past and contributed to changes in evapotranspiration (Bormann, 2011) but this is not in agreement with a worldwide observed decrease in wind speed and pan evaporation (Farquhar and Roderick, 2007; McVicar et al., 2012). These conflicting observations depending on climate classification, country or region, make it necessary to analyze grape growing regions with respect to developments in ETp and precipitation patterns much more in detail in order to make predictions with respect to an increased risk in terms of water shortage. There is a general lack of studies analyzing the past development in ETp and precipitation for different wine growing regions across the planet in order to answer the question whether the threat for sustained drought will increase. When ETp was set to increase in a future climate scenario, substantial reductions in pre-dawn leaf water potential resulted when a dynamic physiological grapevine water model was used (Lebon et al., 2003) to estimate water consumption (Schultz and Lebon, 2005). However, the large spatial and temporal variability in precipitation patterns between regions preclude generalizations in predicted consequences with respect to soil and plant water status development. Water limited worlds versus
机译:气候的预测发展是针对特定地区的,只有考虑到具有多种技术,环境,经济和社会影响的区域特征,适应才能成功。例如,除了一些针对新出现的环境约束的明显适应策略之外,“表面”之下还有更多的“基本”挑战。许多地区最关注的问题之一是水的可用性以及温度的升高将如何驱动大气的蒸发需求。为此,需要分析各个区域以量化可能的相关风险。本文将解决世界不同地区葡萄种植地区在区域水关系方面的差异,以此作为解决上述问题的基础。引言气候变化对陆地水循环的影响显示出区域差异模式。尽管世界上许多葡萄种植区的温度都在升高(Jones等人,2005; Schultz和Jones,2010; Webb等人,2012; Hannah等人,2013;Tóth和Végvári,2016),但降水之间的差异很大区域,并且可能显示出巨大的时间变化(在几年之间和几年之内)(IPCC,2014)。从升高的温度出发,大多数情况下都认为,随着克劳修斯-克拉珀龙定律(Krysanova等人,2008)的作用,大气中的持水量将来会增加,该定律预测大气中的饱和蒸气压将增加6。每摄氏度-7%。结果,假设潜在的蒸散量同时增加(由于温度,蒸气压赤字,辐射和风速,ETp等气候因素的变化,可能从土壤中蒸发并被植物蒸发的水量)。很多情况下,这将改变土壤与植物水的关系。但是,相同的基本原理还预测每度变暖会使降水增加1-2%(Farquhar和Roderick,2007)。此外,许多地区的模型预测都预测了降水模式的变化,因此,与ETp增加的可能性相结合,全世界的农民担心缺水的可能性和灌溉用水的增加。但是,区域之间降水模式的时空变化很大,因此无法对土壤和植物水分状况发展的预期后果进行概括。尤其是时间上的可变性可能掩盖了ETp发展的长期趋势,进而掩盖了土壤和植物的水分状况(van Leeuwen等,2010)。此外,在许多研究中,对生长季节(春季-夏季)发展的关注可能会错过“淡季”(冬季-初春)期间发生的决定性影响,但会对该季节产生重大影响。蒸发是由温度,湿度,太阳辐射和风速的变化驱动的,并且由于气候变化而与预期相反,全世界都有关于蒸发需求减少的报道(Farquhar和Roderick,2007)。在许多情况下,这与地球上许多地区(包括欧洲的葡萄酒产区)直到80年代初观测到的太阳辐射减少有关(全球变暗,(Wild等人,2005; Hofmann和Schultz,2010)。上个世纪。但是,某些地区的ETp持续增加,这表明在观察到的那段时间段内,空气动力学成分的变化必须足以抵消辐射的降低(Schultz和Hofmann,2016年)。在德国的某些地区,过去的大气风速和蒸气压亏缺(VPD)有所增加,并导致了蒸散量的变化(Bormann,2011年),但这与世界范围内观察到的风速和风向的下降不一致。蒸发(Farquhar和Roderick,2007; McVicar等人,2012)。这些取决于气候分类,国家或地区的相互矛盾的观察结果使得有必要针对ETp的发展和降水模式对葡萄种植地区进行更详细的分析,以便就缺水风险的增加做出预测。普遍缺乏分析地球上不同葡萄酒产区的ETp和降水过去发展的研究,以回答持续干旱的威胁是否会增加的问题。当将ETp设置为在未来的气候情景中增加时,使用动态生理葡萄水模型(Lebon等人,2003)估算耗水量时,黎明前叶片水势会大大降低(Schultz和Lebon,2005) 。但是,区域之间降水模式的时空变化很大,因此无法对土壤和植物水分状况发展的预期后果进行概括。水有限世界与

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号