首页> 外文期刊>Research & Politics >How political are national identities? A comparison of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany in the 2010s
【24h】

How political are national identities? A comparison of the United States, the United Kingdom, and Germany in the 2010s

机译:民族身份的政治性如何?美国,英国和德国在2010年代的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Research demonstrates the multi-dimensional nature of American identity arguing that the normative content of American identity relates to political ideologies in the United States, but the sense of belonging to the nation does not. This paper replicates that analysis and extends it to the German and British cases. Exploratory structural equation modeling attests to cross-cultural validity of measures of the sense of belonging and norms of uncritical loyalty and engagement for positive change. In the 2010s, we find partisanship and ideology in all three nations explains levels of belonging and the two content dimensions. Interestingly, those identifying with major parties of the left and right in all three countries have a higher sense of belonging and uncritical loyalty than their moderate counterparts. The relationship between partisanship, ideology, and national identity seems to wax and wane over time, presumably because elite political discourse linking party or ideology to identity varies from one political moment to the next.
机译:研究证明了美国身份的多维性质,认为美国身份的规范性内容与美国的政治意识形态有关,但对国家的归属感却与之无关。本文复制了该分析并将其扩展到德国和英国的案例。探索性的结构方程模型证明了对归属感的度量以及对积极变革的非批判忠诚和参与规范的跨文化有效性。在2010年代,我们发现所有三个国家的党派和意识形态都说明了归属水平和两个内容维度。有趣的是,与这三个国家的温和派相比,在这三个国家中都认同左派和右派主要政党的人具有更高的归属感和非批判的忠诚度。党派关系,意识形态和民族身份之间的关系似乎随着时间的流逝而消逝,大概是因为将政党或意识形态与身份联系起来的精英政治话语在一个政治时刻与下一政治时刻之间是不同的。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号