首页> 外文期刊>Oeno One >Mechanical harvesting optimization and postharvest treatments to improve wine quality
【24h】

Mechanical harvesting optimization and postharvest treatments to improve wine quality

机译:机械采收优化和收获后处理以提高葡萄酒质量

获取原文
       

摘要

Aims: The aim of this work was to verify the influence of mechanical harvesting and postharvest treatments on wine composition.Methods and results: Trials were carried out in triplicate on cv. Montuni grapes. The estimated best setting frequency for the mechanical harvester was 410 shakes/min. Comparing hand-picked and mechanically harvested grapes, the reduced extract and pH results were lower for the hand-picked grapes, showing a more evident berry breakage caused by the mechanical harvester. The wines obtained from mechanically harvested grapes had a lower phenolic compound content than wines produced with hand-picked grapes, indicating that oxidation phenomena occurred; the trend for postharvest treated grapes was different. The significantly lower amount of higher alcohols in the hand-picked grapes trial than in the mechanically harvested ones could be explained by a lower amount of their precursors and oxygen in musts. The sensory differences among the trials were significant for some parameters, but an overall view of the data suggested that the differences were not remarkable and all the wines were good.Conclusion: Postharvest treatments reduce the loss of natural antioxidant compounds found in wines produced from mechanically harvested grapes. Mechanical harvesting does not have a negative influence on wine composition if matched with the proper vineyard characteristics, machine settings and postharvest treatments. The typicality of Montuni wine is maintained in the cases of grapes harvested mechanically with, but also without, any postharvest treatment. The use of these treatments is otherwise useful to obtain wines with a better stability.Significance and impact of the study: With respect to mechanical harvesting, this study highlights the importance of maintaining and/or improving the quality of mechanically harvested grapes containing the harvesting costs.
机译:目的:这项工作的目的是验证机械收割和采后处理对葡萄酒成分的影响。方法和结果:对cv一式三份进行试验。蒙蒂尼葡萄。机械收割机的最佳设定频率估计为410次/分钟。比较手工采摘和机械采摘的葡萄,手工采摘的葡萄减少的提取物和pH值结果更低,显示出机械采摘机造成的更明显的浆果破裂。用机械采摘的葡萄制得的葡萄酒比手工采摘的葡萄制得的葡萄酒具有较低的酚类化合物含量,这表明发生了氧化现象。采后处理的葡萄的趋势不同。在手工采摘的葡萄试验中,高级醇的含量明显低于机械采摘的葡萄,这可以用较低的前体和葡萄汁中的氧气来解释。试验之间的感官差异在某些参数上是显着的,但数据的总体观察表明差异并不显着且所有葡萄酒均良好。结论:收获后处理减少了用机械方法生产的葡萄酒中发现的天然抗氧化剂的损失。收获的葡萄。如果与适当的葡萄园特征,机器设置和收获后处理相匹配,机械收获不会对葡萄酒成分产生负面影响。在进行机械采摘的葡萄中,无论是否经过任何采后处理,都可以保持Montuni葡萄酒的典型性。否则,这些处理方法对于获得具有更好稳定性的葡萄酒是有用的。研究的意义和影响:关于机械收获,本研究强调了保持和/或提高包含收获成本的机械收获葡萄质量的重要性。 。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号