首页> 外文期刊>Open Heart >Randomised comparison of zofenopril and ramipril plus acetylsalicylic acid in postmyocardial infarction patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a post hoc analysis of the SMILE-4 Study in patients according to levels of left ventricular ejection fraction at entry
【24h】

Randomised comparison of zofenopril and ramipril plus acetylsalicylic acid in postmyocardial infarction patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction: a post hoc analysis of the SMILE-4 Study in patients according to levels of left ventricular ejection fraction at entry

机译:左芬尼普利和雷米普利加乙酰水杨酸在心肌梗死后左室收缩功能不全患者中的随机比较:根据入院时左心室射血分数的水平对患者进行的SMILE-4研究的事后分析

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective Conflicting evidence exists on the benefits of treating patients with coronary artery disease and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) with an ACE inhibitor. This retrospective analysis of the SMILE-4 Study sought to compare the efficacy of zofenopril 60?mg plus acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) versus ramipril 10?mg plus ASA 100?mg in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and heart failure, according to an impaired or preserved LVEF. Methods The primary study end point was 1-year combined occurrence of death or hospitalisation for cardiovascular causes. A preserved LVEF was defined by a baseline LVEF 40% and an impaired one by an LVEF ≤40%. Results 448 patients (63%) had preserved and 262 (37%) had impaired LVEF. The primary end point occurred in 125 patients with preserved (28%) and 106 patients with impaired LVEF (41%, p=0.001). In the first group, the rate of major cardiovascular events was significantly lower under zofenopril than under ramipril (23% vs 33%; OR and 95% CI 0.60, 0.39 to 0.91; p=0.016). This was also the case for patients with impaired LVEF, though between-group difference was not statistically significant (38% zofenopril vs 44% ramipril; OR 0.77, 0.47 to 1.26; p=0.297). LVEF values significantly (p0.0001) increased during the follow-up in both subsets with no between-treatment differences. However, improvement rates in LVEF (increase ≥5%) were higher in patients with impaired LVEF (72% vs 61%, p=0.006). Conclusions In the SMILE-4 Study, the cardiovascular outcome of patients with post-AMI with preserved LVEF was more favourable in the zofenopril than in the ramipril treatment group. Trial registration number EudraCT Number: 2004-001150-88 (http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu); Italian Ministry of Health Code: GUIDOTT_III_2004_001 (https://oss-sper-clin.agenziafarmaco.it).
机译:目的关于使用ACEI抑制剂治疗冠心病和保留左心室射血分数(LVEF)的患者的益处存在矛盾的证据。这项对SMILE-4研究的回顾性分析旨在比较zofenopril 60?mg加乙酰水杨酸(ASA)与雷米普利10?mg加ASA 100?mg在急性心肌梗死(AMI)和心力衰竭患者中的​​疗效LVEF受损或保留。方法主要研究终点为合并因心血管原因死亡或住院的1年合并发生。 LVEF保留的定义为基线LVEF> 40%,受损的定义为LVEF≤40%。结果448例患者(63%)保留下来,262例(37%)LVEF受损。主要终点发生在125例保留(28%)和106例LVEF受损(41%,p = 0.001)的患者中。在第一组中,佐芬普利组的主要心血管事件发生率显着低于雷米普利组(23%vs 33%; OR和95%CI 0.60,0.39至0.91; p = 0.016)。 LVEF受损的患者也是如此,尽管组间差异无统计学意义(38%zofenopril对44%ramipril; OR 0.77,0.47至1.26; p = 0.297)。随访期间,两个亚组的LVEF值均显着增加(p <0.0001),且治疗间无差异。但是,LVEF受损的患者LVEF改善率(增加≥5%)更高(72%vs 61%,p = 0.006)。结论在SMILE-4研究中,佐芬普利比雷米普利治疗组的LVEF保留的AMI后AMI患者的心血管结局更有利。试验注册号EudraCT号:2004-001150-88(http://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu);意大利卫生部代码:GUIDOTT_III_2004_001(https://oss-sper-clin.agenziafarmaco.it)。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号