...
首页> 外文期刊>Research & Politics >Can experience overcome stereotypes in times of terror threat?:
【24h】

Can experience overcome stereotypes in times of terror threat?:

机译:在恐怖威胁时期,经验能否克服成见?:

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Research on evaluations of leaders has frequently found that female leaders receive lower ratings in times of national security crisis. However, less is known about countervailing factors. We contend that partisanship and leadership experience in relevant domains are two factors that can counteract the negative effects of terrorist threat on evaluations of female political leaders. To test this expectation, we implemented a national study in 2012 containing terrorist threat and non-threat conditions, and then asked participants to evaluate political leaders. The results show that Republican leaders, including women, are unaffected by terrorist threat; in contrast, Democratic leaders are punished during times of terrorist threat, but this negative effect is smaller for then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton compared to Nancy Pelosi, who lacks similar experience. In short, Republican partisanship is a strong countervailing factor, while leadership experience in national security more modestly countervails.
机译:对领导者评估的研究经常发现,在国家安全危机时期,女性领导者的评级较低。但是,对反补贴因素知之甚少。我们认为,相关领域的党派参与和领导经验是可以抵消恐怖主义威胁对女性政治领导人的评价所产生的负面影响的两个因素。为了检验这一期望,我们在2012年实施了一项包含恐怖主义威胁和非威胁条件的全国性研究,然后要求参与者评估政治领导人。结果表明,包括妇女在内的共和党领导人不受恐怖主义威胁的影响;相比之下,民主党领导人在遭受恐怖威胁时会受到惩罚,但是与缺乏类似经验的南希·佩洛西相比,当时的国务卿希拉里·克林顿的负面影响要小。简而言之,共和党的党派关系是一个强大的反补贴因素,而在国家安全领域的领导经验则适度地反补贴。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号