Dosimetric comparison of different algorithms in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plan for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

摘要

Purposes: The main aim of the study was to investigate the dosimetric difference between acuros XB algorithm (AXB), anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA), and pencil beam convolution (PBC) algorithm in stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) plan for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients and Methods: Thirty-eight NSCLC patients were included. GTV, PTV, and organs at risk were delineated by the radiation oncologists. Three optimized SBRT plans for each patients were gained using three algorithms of AXB, AAA, and PBC with the identical plan parameters. Dosimetric endpoints were collected and compared among the three plans, including dosimetric criteria: V100%, V90%, PTV Dsubmin/sub, Dsubmax/sub, Dsubmean/sub, homogeneity index (HI), and Paddick conformity index (CI). Results: AXB plan resulted in decreased V100% with a mean difference 6.14% compared with PBC plan (For V100%, AXB vs AAA vs PBC=93.44% vs 95.54% vs 99.58%, P 0.05). Three plans showed no significant difference as to the parameter V90%. AXB plan leaded to reduced Dsubmin/sub of PTV compared with other two algorithms (For Dsubmin/sub of PTV, AXB vs AAA vs PBC=4048cGy vs 4365Gy vs 4873Gy, P 0.05). PBC induced the enhanced trend of Dsubmax/sub of PTV compared with other two algorithms (Dsubmax/sub among three algorithms, P 0.05); and increased the Dsubmean/sub of PTV in three algorithms with significant difference (For Dsubmean/sub of PTV, AXB vs AAA vs PBC=5332cGy vs 5330Gy vs 5785Gy, P 0.05). AXB algorithm achieved a similar plan conformity with other two algorithms (For CI, AXB vs AAA vs PBC=0.80 vs 0.85 vs 0.71, P 0.05). Conclusion: For SBRT plan of NSCLC, AAA and PBC algorithms overestimate target coverage, AXB algorithm is recommended for the SBRT plan of NSCLC.