首页> 外文期刊>Rheumatology Advances in Practice >A common rheumatology referral of vague constitutional symptoms and raised inflammatory markers
【24h】

A common rheumatology referral of vague constitutional symptoms and raised inflammatory markers

机译:常见的风湿病转诊包括模糊的体质症状和炎性标志物升高

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Giant cell arteritis (GCA) is an inflammatory process affecting the medium/large vessels. Initially, the symptoms are vague constitutional symptoms caused by systemic inflammation. It is a chronic, granulomatous inflammation which most classically causes headache (in the temporal/occipital region), jaw claudication, scalp tenderness and visual loss/disturbance. There is now thought to be subgroups of GCA, one of which causes inflammation without temporal involvement (LV-GCA). If left untreated, this can have serious complications including ischemia (including cerebrovascular accident) and aortic aneurysm/dissection. Diagnosis of this subgroup can be challenging and in depth scanning is often required to support this. Case description A 75-year-old female presents with symptomatic anaemia (dizziness and shortness of breath) with haemoglobin of 72. This improves to 110 with 2 units blood transfusion but CRP is elevated at 250-290 during admission. Initially, this is treated as a UTI but CRP does not improve. She describes vague symptoms of fatigue for “weeks” and generally feeling unwell but no specific symptoms. She denies weight loss and there are no obvious infective sounding symptoms. She has a past medical history of left-sided lung adenocarcinoma 2 years previously which was fully treated with lobectomy, recently diagnosed as Iron deficient anaemia, vague history of seronegative rheumatoid arthritis (on no treatment and no Rheumatology review), Diverticular disease and hypothyroid. Non-smoker and lives with husband and has full independence. Her LFT’s were deranged with mildly raised ALP/AST/ALT and there was also a description of nose bleed from the family 2 weeks prior to admission. She had a CT CAP which showed nil remarkable except trace fluid in pelvis. ESR is also raised 100 and albumin is low. On further discussion when I reviewed her she described stiffness and pain in axial skeleton in keeping with PMR. There was no synovitis or tenderness in the joints, no rash, no sinusitis and no muscle tenderness. No features to suggest CTD or CREST. No headache or visual disturbance. Plan was to assess ANCA, myeloma screen and arrange a PET scan for large vessel vasculitis given the CRP/ESR. PET scan confirmed large vessel vasculitis - Marked FDG activity identified within the arterial walls of the large vessels throughout (carotids, subclavian arteries, aorta, iliacs and femoral arteries). She was commenced on prednisolone with markedly good effect 2 weeks post treatment and is now on a reducing course of this with rheumatology follow up. Discussion GCA commonly affects people over the age of 50 and predominantly females. It causes inflammation in any of the proximal branches of the aorta and including the aorta itself. The diagnosis relies on the clinical history and inflammatory marker response. On occasions there will be overlap with polymyalgia rheumatica (PMR). A rational approach to diagnosis in GCA is required, based on a combination of clinical features together with relevant investigations. Extra-cranial GCA (or LV-GCA) is a specific subgroup of GCA which will quite often not show the typical clinical features attributed to GCA. Importantly, it is now recognised that large vessel involvement is very common in all GCA patients and can lead to marked complications. PET-CT scanning is extremely useful in diagnosing LV-GCA but delays occur in diagnosis secondary to waiting times and resources to carry out the scan and there is some information which suggests that these scans may lead to over-estimation of inflammation. Other imaging modalities include USS of some of the proximal branches of the aorta and CT/MRI angiography. The concern of missing this diagnosis can be severe including ischaemic events, aneurysm of the aorta and possible CVA leading to significant morbidity and mortality. It is now wondered whether some of the patients who develop these complications could have underlying LVV. Differential diagnoses must also be sought when making a diagnosis of LV-GCA including multiple myeloma, endocarditis/infections, other Rheumatological conditions and atherosclerosis. This can again lead to uncertainties when making a diagnosis. It is important to commence steroid therapy at the earliest opportunity but awareness is required surrounding investigations and organising this as steroids can mask inflammation. Therefore it is important to correctly make the diagnosis with certainty and obtain a scan to prove LV-GCA as soon as possible. Key learning points One area of difficulty remains on the course of treatment for the extra-cranial GCA subgroup (or LV-GCA) and at present this is treated in the same way as cranial GCA. However, obviously with the advancements in tocilizumab as a steroid sparing therapy in cranial GCA this leads to a difficulty in understanding its role for the LV-GCA. Given the issue of not understanding biologics role in LV-GCA, this causes difficulty in utilising
机译:简介巨细胞动脉炎(GCA)是影响中/大血管的炎症过程。最初,这些症状是全身性炎症引起的模糊体质症状。它是一种慢性肉芽肿性炎症,最典型地引起头痛(在颞/枕骨区域),jaw行lau行,头皮压痛和视力减退/困扰。现在认为是GCA的亚组,其中之一可引起炎症而无颞部受累(LV-GCA)。如果不加以治疗,可能会导致严重的并发症,包括缺血(包括脑血管意外)和主动脉瘤/解剖。该亚组的诊断可能具有挑战性,因此通常需要进行深度扫描以支持此诊断。病例描述一名75岁女性出现症状性贫血(头晕和呼吸急促),血红蛋白为72。通过2单位输血可提高至110,但入院时CRP升高至250-290。最初,它被视为UTI,但CRP并没有改善。她描述了数周的模糊疲劳症状,通常感觉不适,但没有特定症状。她否认体重减轻,没有明显的感染性症状。她有2年的左肺腺癌的病史,并已接受了肺叶切除术的全面治疗,最近被诊断为铁缺乏性贫血,血清阴性类风湿性关节炎病史模糊(未经治疗且未接受风湿病学复习),憩室病和甲状腺功能减退。不吸烟,与丈夫住在一起,具有完全的独立性。她的LFT因ALP / AST / ALT轻度升高而紊乱,入院前2周也有流鼻血的描述。她的CT CAP显示除骨盆中有微量液体外,其他均无显着性。 ESR也升高> 100,白蛋白低。在进一步讨论中,当我查看她时,她描述了与PMR一致的轴向骨骼僵硬和疼痛。关节无滑膜炎或压痛,无皮疹,鼻窦炎和肌肉压痛。没有建议CTD或CREST的功能。没有头痛或视觉障碍。计划是评估ANCA,骨髓瘤筛查,并安排给予CRP / ESR的大血管血管炎的PET扫描。 PET扫描证实了大血管血管炎-在整个大血管(颈动脉,锁骨下动脉,主动脉,cs和股动脉)的动脉壁内均发现了明显的FDG活性。治疗后2周,她开始接受泼尼松龙的治疗,效果显着,现在通过风湿病随访来减轻其病程。讨论GCA通常会影响50岁以上的人群,主要是女性。它在主动脉的任何近端分支(包括主动脉本身)中引起炎症。诊断取决于临床病史和炎症标志物反应。有时会与风湿性多肌痛(PMR)重叠。基于临床特征和相关研究的结合,需要一种合理的GCA诊断方法。颅外GCA(或LV-GCA)是GCA的特定亚组,通常不会显示GCA的典型临床特征。重要的是,现已认识到大血管受累在所有GCA患者中非常普遍,并可能导致明显的并发症。 PET-CT扫描在诊断LV-GCA中非常有用,但是由于等待时间和执行扫描所需的资源,诊断中会出现延迟,并且有一些信息表明这些扫描可能导致炎症的过高估计。其他成像方式包括主动脉某些近端分支的USS和CT / MRI血管造影。缺少该诊断的担忧可能很严重,包括缺血性事件,主动脉瘤和可能导致显着发病率和死亡率的CVA。现在想知道一些发生这些并发症的患者是否可能患有潜在的LVV。诊断LV-GCA时还必须寻求鉴别诊断,包括多发性骨髓瘤,心内膜炎/感染,其他风湿病和动脉粥样硬化。进行诊断时,这可能再次导致不确定性。尽早开始类固醇治疗很重要,但是需要围绕调查进行了解并进行组织,因为类固醇可以掩盖炎症。因此,重要的是要正确地进行确定性诊断并尽快进行扫描以证明LV-GCA。关键学习要点颅外GCA亚组(或LV-GCA)的治疗过程中仍然存在一个困难领域,目前,与颅GCA的治疗方法相同。然而,显然随着托珠单抗在颅内GCA中作为类固醇保留疗法的进展,这导致难以理解其对LV-GCA的作用。鉴于不了解LV-GCA中生物制剂作用的问题,这导致难以利用

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号