...
首页> 外文期刊>RMD Open >Original article: Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations
【24h】

Original article: Current status of use of big data and artificial intelligence in RMDs: a systematic literature review informing EULAR recommendations

机译:原始文章:RMD中使用大数据和人工智能的现状:系统的文献综述,告知EULAR建议

获取原文
           

摘要

Objective To assess the current use of big data and artificial intelligence (AI) in the field of rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs).Methods A systematic literature review was performed in PubMed MEDLINE in November 2018, with key words referring to big data, AI and RMDs. All original reports published in English were analysed. A mirror literature review was also performed outside of RMDs on the same number of articles. The number of data analysed, data sources and statistical methods used (traditional statistics, AI or both) were collected. The analysis compared findings within and beyond the field of RMDs.Results Of 567 articles relating to RMDs, 55 met the inclusion criteria and were analysed, as well as 55 articles in other medical fields. The mean number of data points was 746?million (range 2000–5?billion) in RMDs, and 9.1?billion (range 100?000–200?billion) outside of RMDs. Data sources were varied: in RMDs, 26 (47%) were clinical, 8 (15%) biological and 16 (29%) radiological. Both traditional and AI methods were used to analyse big data (respectively, 10 (18%) and 45 (82%) in RMDs and 8 (15%) and 47 (85%) out of RMDs). Machine learning represented 97% of AI methods in RMDs and among these methods, the most represented was artificial neural network (20/44 articles in RMDs).Conclusions Big data sources and types are varied within the field of RMDs, and methods used to analyse big data were heterogeneous. These findings will inform a European League Against Rheumatism taskforce on big data in RMDs.
机译:目的评估风湿和肌肉骨骼疾病(RMD)领域中大数据和人工智能(AI)的当前使用方法.2018年11月,PubMed MEDLINE进行了系统的文献综述,关键词指大数据,AI和RMD。分析了所有以英文发表的原始报告。在RMD之外还对相同数量的文章进行了镜像文献审查。收集了分析的数据数量,使用的数据源和统计方法(传统统计,AI或两者)。分析比较了RMD领域内外的结果。结果在567篇有关RMD的文章中,有55篇符合纳入标准并进行了分析,在其他医学领域中有55篇。 RMD中的数据点平均数为7.46亿(范围为2000-55,000亿),RMD以外的数据点为91亿(范围为100-2000-200亿)。数据来源各不相同:在RMD中,有26(47%)是临床的,8(15%)生物学的和16(29%)放射的。传统方法和AI方法都用于分析大数据(分别是RMD中的10(18%)和45(82%),RMD中的8(15%)和47(85%)。机器学习代表了RMD中AI方法的97%,其中代表最多的是人工神经网络(RMD中20/44篇文章)。结论RMD领域内的大数据源和类型各不相同,并且用于分析的方法也有所不同大数据是异构的。这些发现将为欧洲抗风湿病联盟的RMD大数据提供参考。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号