首页> 外文期刊>Revista de Contabilidad >A Comparative Study of Difficulties in Accounting Preparation and Judgement in Agriculture Using Fair Value and Historical Cost for Biological Assets Valuation
【24h】

A Comparative Study of Difficulties in Accounting Preparation and Judgement in Agriculture Using Fair Value and Historical Cost for Biological Assets Valuation

机译:利用公允价值和历史成本进行生物资产评估的农业会计编制和判断难度的比较研究。

获取原文
       

摘要

This paper presents empirical research comparing the accounting difficulties that arise from the use of two valuation methods for biological assets, fair value (FV) and historical cost (HC) accounting, in the agricultural sector. It also compares how reliable each valuation method is in the decision-making process of agents within the sector. By conducting an experiment with students, farmers, and accountants operating in the agricultural sector, we find that they have more difficulties, make larger miscalculations and make poorer judgements with HC accounting than with FV accounting. In-depth interviews uncover flawed accounting practices in the agricultural sector in Spain in order to meet HC accounting requirements. Given the complexities of cost calculation for biological assets and the predominance of small family business units in advanced Western countries, the study concludes that accounting can be more easily applied in the agricultural sector under FV than HC accounting, and that HC conveys a less accurate grasp of the real situation of a farm.
机译:本文提出了一项实证研究,比较了在农业部门中对生物资产使用两种估值方法公允价值(FV)和历史成本(HC)会计所产生的会计困难。它还比较了每种评估方法在该行业内代理商的决策过程中的可靠性。通过与在农业部门工作的学生,农民和会计师进行的实验,我们发现与HC会计相比,与HC会计相比,他们面临更多的困难,做出更大的错误估计并做出较差的判断。深入访谈发现了西班牙农业部门中有缺陷的会计惯例,以满足HC会计要求。考虑到生物资产成本计算的复杂性以及西方先进国家中小型家族企业的主导地位,该研究得出的结论是,与以HC进行会计处理相比,以FV进行会计处理更容易应用于农业领域,并且HC传达的准确度较低农场的真实情况。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号