首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia >Comparison of the recovery rate of otomycosis using betadine and clotrimazole topical treatment
【24h】

Comparison of the recovery rate of otomycosis using betadine and clotrimazole topical treatment

机译:甜菜碱与克霉唑局部治疗对耳菌病的恢复率比较

获取原文
           

摘要

Introduction Otomycosis is a common diseases that can be associated with many complications including involvement of the inner ear and mortality in rare cases. Management of otomycosis can be challenging, and requires a close follow-up. Treatment options for otomycosis include local debridement, local and systemic antifungal agents and utilization of topical antiseptics. Objective This study was designed to compare the recovery rate of otomycosis using two therapeutic methods; topical betadine (Povidone-iodine) and clotrimazole. Methods In this single-blind clinical trial, 204 patients with otomycosis were selected using a non-probability convenient sampling method and were randomly assigned to two treatment groups of topical betadine and clotrimazole (102 patients in each group). Response to treatment was assessed at 4, 10 and 20 days after treatment. Data were analyzed using the independent t-test, Chi-Square and Fisher exact test in SPSS v.18 software, at a significance level of p 0.05. Results The results showed that out of 204 patients with otomycosis, fungi type isolated included Aspergillus in 151 cases (74%), and Candida albicans in 53 patients (26%). On the fourth day after treatment, 13 patients (13.1%) in the group treated with betadine and 10 patients (9.8%) in the group treated with clotrimazole showed a good clinical response to treatment (p = 0.75). A good response to treatment was reported for 44 (43.1%) and 47 patients (46.1%) on the tenth day after the treatment (p = 0.85); and 70 (68.6%) and 68 patients (67.6%) on the twentieth day after treatment (p = 0.46) in the groups treated with betadine and clotrimazole, respectively. The response to treatment was thus not significantly different in the two groups. Conclusion In the present study the efficacy of betadine and clotrimazole was the same for the treatment of otomycosis. The result of this study supports the use of betadine as an effective antifungal in otomycosis treatment, helping to avoid the emergence of resistant organisms.
机译:引言口腔病是一种常见疾病,可能与许多并发症相关,包括内耳受累和极少数情况下的死亡率。耳菌病的治疗可能具有挑战性,需要密切随访。耳菌病的治疗选择包括局部清创术,局部和全身性抗真菌药以及使用局部防腐剂。目的本研究旨在比较两种治疗方法对耳菌病的恢复率。外用倍他定(聚维酮碘)和克霉唑。方法在该单盲临床试验中,采用非概率方便抽样方法选择204例耳菌病患者,并随机分为局部使用甜菜碱和克霉唑的两个治疗组(每组102例)。在治疗后第4、10和20天评估对治疗的反应。在SPSS v.18软件中使用独立的t检验,卡方检验和Fisher精确检验对数据进行分析,显着性水平为p <0.05。结果结果显示,在204例真菌病患者中,分离出的真菌类型包括151例曲霉菌(74%)和白色念珠菌53例(26%)。在治疗后的第四天,接受甜菜碱治疗的组中有13例患者(13.1%)和接受克霉唑治疗的组中有10例患者(9.8%)对治疗表现出良好的临床反应(p = 0.75)。在治疗后的第十天,有44名患者(43.1%)和47名患者(46.1%)对治疗反应良好(p = 0.85);在用甜菜碱和克霉唑治疗的组中,治疗后第20天分别有70名(68.6%)和68名患者(67.6%)(p = 0.46)。因此,两组的治疗反应无​​明显差异。结论在本研究中,甜菜碱和克霉唑在治疗真菌病中的疗效相同。这项研究的结果支持将Betadine作为有效的抗真菌药用于耳菌病治疗,有助于避免耐药菌的出现。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号