首页> 外文期刊>Radiation oncology >The treatment of extensive scalp lesions using coplanar and non-coplanar photon IMRT: a single institution experience
【24h】

The treatment of extensive scalp lesions using coplanar and non-coplanar photon IMRT: a single institution experience

机译:使用共面和非共面光子IMRT治疗广泛的头皮病变:单一机构的经验

获取原文
           

摘要

Background This clinical study compared four different cases of extensive scalp malignancies treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy. The merits of coplanar and non-coplanar Step-and-shoot total scalp irradiation techniques were evaluated against the background of the literature. Methods Four patients (angiosarcoma, n=2, cutaneous B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, B-NHL, n=1, mycosis fungoides, n=1) treated between 2008 and 2012 at our institution were retrospectively analyzed. For every patient with executed coplanar plan, a non-coplanar plan and vice versa has been calculated additionally for direct comparison. Three patients underwent limited surgery before radiotherapy. Individual adapted bolus material was used for every patient (helmet). Total scalp dose was 30 Gy (B-NHL, mycosis fungoides) and 50 Gy (angiosarcoma) with fractional doses of 2.0-2.5 Gy (without sequential local boost in three patients). Conformity and homogeneity indexes and dose volume histograms were used for treatment plan comparison. Results Dose hot spots were higher in coplanar plans (110-128% Dmax). Non-coplanar plans showed a more homogeneous dose distribution (HI = .12 - .17) and superior PTV coverage (88 - 96%). Target dose coverage was 81-117% in non-coplanar and 30-128% in coplanar plans. Coplanar plans yielded a stronger dose gradient across the target (.7-1.6 Gy/mm) compared to non-coplanar plans (.8-1.3 Gy/mm). The most conformal plan was a non-coplanar plan (CI = .7). Mean and maximum brain doses were comparable and showed an almost linear decrease between min. and max. dose. The optic chiasm and brain stem was spared most with non-coplanar plans, mean doses to the lenses ranged between 4 and 8 Gy and were higher in non-coplanar plans as were doses to the optic nerves. Radiotherapy tolerance was acceptable and acute side effects included erythema, scalp pain, alopecia and radiodermatitis which all spontaneously resolved. Two patients accomplished partial response, two patients showed complete response after radiotherapy. Three patients had locally controlled tumors without recurrence until their deaths or at last follow up, one patient had local progression shortly after radiotherapy. Conclusions Photon-IMRT is an effective and feasible approach to treat extensive scalp malignancies. Non-coplanar beams could increase dose homogeneity and PTV coverage and might reduce doses particularly to the optic chiasm.
机译:背景本临床研究比较了四种通过强度调制放射疗法治疗的头皮恶性肿瘤的不同病例。在文献的背景下,评估了共面和非共面即拍即拍全头皮照射技术的优点。方法回顾性分析我院2008年至2012年收治的4例患者(血管肉瘤,n = 2,皮肤B细胞非霍奇金淋巴瘤,B-NHL,n = 1,真菌病,n = 1)。对于已执行共平面计划的每个患者,还额外计算了一个非共平面计划,反之亦然,以进行直接比较。三名患者在放疗前进行了有限的手术。每个患者(头盔)均使用单独的适应性推注材料。头皮总剂量为30 Gy(B-NHL,真菌病真菌病)和50 Gy(血管肉瘤),分次剂量为2.0-2.5 Gy(三名患者无连续局部加强剂量)。一致性和均一性指标以及剂量体积直方图用于比较治疗方案。结果共平面计划中的剂量热点更高(最大Dmax为110-128%)。非共面计划显示更均匀的剂量分布(HI = .12-.17)和PTV覆盖率更高(88-96%)。在非共面计划中,目标剂量覆盖率为81-117%,在共面计划中为30-128%。与非共面计划(.8-1.3 Gy / mm)相比,共面计划在整个靶标上产生了更大的剂量梯度(.7-1.6 Gy / mm)。最符合计划的是非共计划(CI = 0.7)。平均和最大脑部剂量是可比的,并且在最小与最大剂量之间呈线性下降。和最大剂量。对于非共面计划,视交叉和脑干最多,在平均水平的晶状体剂量在4至8 Gy之间,在非共平面计划中,视神经的平均剂量更高。放射疗法的耐受性是可以接受的,急性副作用包括红斑,头皮疼痛,脱发和放射性皮肤炎,所有这些都能自发解决。两名患者完成部分缓解,两名患者放疗后显示完全缓解。 3例患者局部控制肿瘤直到死亡或最后一次随访均未复发,其中1例患者在放疗后不久出现局部进展。结论光子IMRT是治疗广泛性头皮恶性肿瘤的一种有效可行的方法。非共面光束可以增加剂量均匀性和PTV覆盖范围,并可能减少剂量,尤其是对于视交叉症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号