...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Compara??o das técnicas transarterial e de estimula??o de múltiplos nervos para bloqueio do plexo braquial por via axilar usando lidocaína com epinefrina
【24h】

Compara??o das técnicas transarterial e de estimula??o de múltiplos nervos para bloqueio do plexo braquial por via axilar usando lidocaína com epinefrina

机译:利多卡因与肾上腺素经动脉和多神经刺激技术对腋下臂丛神经阻滞的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: High-dose transarterial technique results in highly effective axillary block. The multiple nerve stimulation technique (MNS) requires more time and experience. This prospective study aimed at comparing onset and success rate of multiple-injection axillary brachial plexus block using two methods of nerve location: transarterial or multiple nerve stimulation technique. METHODS: Axillary block was initially induced with 800 mg lidocaine with epinephrine. The transarterial group received deeply injected 30 mL of 1.6% lidocaine with epinephrine, and 20 mL superficially to the axillary artery. For the multiple nerve stimulation group, three terminal motor nerves were electrolocated and blocked with 20 mL, 20 mL and 10 mL. Blockade was considered effective when analgesia was present in all sensory nerves distal to the elbow. RESULTS: Onset (8.8 ± 2.3 min versus 10.2 ± 2.4 min; p-value = 0.010) was significantly shorter in the transarterial group. Complete sensory block of all four nerves (median, ulnar, radial and musculocutaneus) was achieved in 92.5% versus 83.3% for multiple nerve stimulation group and transarterial group, respectively, without significant difference (p = 0.68). Musculocutaneous nerve was significantly easier to be blocked with the aid of peripheral nerve stimulator (p = 0.034). CONCLUSIONS: Both MNS technique for axillary block with nerve stimulator (3 injections) and transarterial technique (2 injections) promote similar results. Musculocutaneous nerve is more easily blocked with the aid of peripheral nerve stimulator. MNS technique has required less supplementary blocks and has delayed beginning of surgery.
机译:背景与目的:大剂量经动脉技术可产生高效的腋窝阻滞。多神经刺激技术(MNS)需要更多的时间和经验。这项前瞻性研究旨在通过两种神经定位方法(多动脉或多神经刺激技术)比较多次注射腋下臂丛神经阻滞的发病率和成功率。方法:最初用800mg利多卡因加肾上腺素诱导腋窝阻塞。经动脉组接受深度注射30毫升1.6%利多卡因和肾上腺素,并向腋动脉表面注射20毫升。对于多神经刺激组,将三个末端运动神经电定位并分别用20 mL,20 mL和10 mL阻断。当在肘部远端的所有感觉神经中均存在镇痛作用时,认为封锁有效。结果:经动脉组的发病时间(8.8±2.3分钟vs 10.2±2.4分钟; p值= 0.010)显着缩短。多神经刺激组和经动脉组分别对所有四个神经(中,尺、,、 radial肌)的完全感觉阻滞分别达到92.5%和83.3%,而无显着性差异(p = 0.68)。借助周围神经刺激器,肌皮神经明显更易于阻塞(p = 0.034)。结论:MNS技术(带神经刺激器的腋窝阻滞)(3次注射)和经动脉技术(2次注射)可取得相似的结果。借助周围神经刺激器,更容易阻塞肌皮神经。 MNS技术需要的辅助块更少,并且延迟了手术开始。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号