首页> 外文期刊>Revista Argentina de Cardiologia >Experiencia con bomba centrífuga magnética en pacientes con shock cardiogénico (INTERMACS 1)
【24h】

Experiencia con bomba centrífuga magnética en pacientes con shock cardiogénico (INTERMACS 1)

机译:电磁离心泵治疗心源性休克的经验(INTERMACS 1)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Introduction Short term use of magnetically-levitated ventricular assist devices offers hemodynamic stabilization of patients with refractory cardiogenic shock in INTERMACS stage 1, enabling a therapeutic strategy. Objective The aira of this study was to assess in a single centre the results with second generation centrifugal flow pumps in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock. Methods Fifteen patients with Levitronix CentriMag? ventricular assist device implantation were retrospectively analyzed from 2006 to 2011. All patients presented refractory cardiogenic shock under two inotropic agents and 13 patients were also assisted with intra aortic balloon pump. The indications were: end stage cardiomyopathy in 8 patients, viral myocarditis in 1 patient, postpartum cardiomyopathy in 1 patient, post-cardiotomy cardiogenic shock in 3 patients and post heart transplantation graft failure in 2 patients. Results Mean age was 49 ± 13 years, and 66% (10/15) were men. Only 1 patient underwent left ventricular assist device implantation (LVA) and 14 patients underwent biventricular assistance (BVA). Mean support duration was 6 ± 4 days (2-19). Final post-implant therapeutic decisión was bridge to heart transplantation in 12 patients (80%), bridge to reoovery in 1 patient (7%) and bridge to decisión in 2 patients (13%). One patient was successfully weaned from BVA due to ventricular function recovery and 8 patients were transplanted, with a survival rate of 60% (9/15). Reoperation due to bleeding was performed in 6 patients (40%) and 1 patient presented cannulae thrombosis. None of the patients had stroke or technical system failures. Six patients died while receiving circulatory assistance (40%) (5 BVA and 1 LVA), 1 patient due to sepsis, 1 patient due to coagulopathy and 4 patients due to múltiple system organ failure. Out of the 6 deaths, 2 patients were in postcardiotomy cardiogenic shock and 4 were on heart transplantation waiting list. Conclusions In this series, circulatory support with Levitronix CentriMag? centrifugal flow pump was effective in critical patients with a survival rate of 60%. Reoperation for bleeding was the most frequent complication.
机译:简介短期使用磁悬浮心室辅助设备可在INTERMACS第1阶段为难治性心源性休克患者提供血流动力学稳定性,从而实现治疗策略。目的这项研究的目的是在单个中心评估第二代离心式流量泵在难治性心源性休克患者中的结果。方法15例Levitronix CentriMag患者?回顾性分析2006年至2011年的心室辅助设备植入情况。所有患者均在两种变力剂的帮助下出现难治性心源性休克,另外13例患者也接受了主动脉内球囊泵辅助。适应症为:末期心肌病8例,病毒性心肌炎1例,产后心肌病1例,心脏切开术后心源性休克3例,心脏移植后移植失败2例。结果平均年龄为49±13岁,男性为66%(10/15)。只有1例患者接受了左心室辅助装置植入(LVA),而14例患者接受了双心室辅助装置(BVA)。平均支持时间为6±4天(2-19)。最终的植入后治疗决定因素是12例患者(80%)与心脏移植的桥梁,1例患者(7%)与治疗的桥梁,2例患者(13%)的决定支架。 1名患者因心室功能恢复而成功从BVA断奶,8例患者被移植,存活率为60%(9/15)。 6例(40%)因出血而再次手术,其中1例出现套管血栓形成。没有患者发生中风或技术系统衰竭。 6例患者在接受循环辅助时死亡(40%)(5 BVA和1 LVA),1例因败血症,1例因凝血病和4例因多系统器官衰竭而死亡。在6例死亡中,有2例因心脏切开术而发生心源性休克,有4例在心脏移植等待名单上。结论在本系列中,使用Levitronix CentriMag的循环支持?离心流泵对危重患者有效,生存率为60%。再次手术出血是最常见的并发症。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号