首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Comparison of early and late percutaneous tracheotomies in adult intensive care unit
【24h】

Comparison of early and late percutaneous tracheotomies in adult intensive care unit

机译:成人重症监护室早期和晚期经皮气管切开术的比较

获取原文
           

摘要

DURAN, Mehmet et al. Comparison of early and late percutaneous tracheotomies in adult intensive care unit. Rev. Bras. Anestesiol. [online]. 2014, vol.64, n.6, pp.438-442. ISSN 0034-7094.? http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.08.002. Background and objectives: Percutaneous tracheotomy has become a good alternative for patients thought to have prolonged intubation in intensive care units. The most important benefits of tracheotomy are early discharge of the patient from the intensive care unit and shortening of the time spent in the hospital. Prolonged endotracheal intubation has complications such as laryngeal damage, vocal cord paralysis, glottic and subglottic stenosis, infection and tracheal damage. The objective of our study was to evaluate potential advantages of early percutaneous tracheotomy over late percutaneous tracheotomy in intensive care unit. Methods: Percutaneous tracheotomies applied to 158 patients in adult intensive care unit have been analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups as early and late tracheotomy according to their endotracheal intubation time before percutaneous tracheotomy. Tracheotomies at the 0–7th days of endotracheal intubation were grouped as early and after the 7th day of endotracheal intubation as late tracheotomies. Patients having infection at the site of tracheotomy, patients with difficult or potential difficult intubation, those under 18 years old, patients with positive end-expiratory pressure above 10 cmH2O and those with bleeding diathesis or platelet count under 50,000 dL?1 were not included in the study. Durations of mechanical ventilation and intensive care stay were noted. Results: There was no statistical difference among the demographic data of the patients. Mechanical ventilation time and time spent in intensive care unit in the group with early tracheotomy was shorter and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Conclusion: Early tracheotomy shortens mechanical ventilation duration and intensive care unit stay. For that reason we suggest early tracheotomy in patients thought to have prolonged intubation.
机译:杜兰,穆罕默德(Mehmet)等人。成人重症监护室早期和晚期经皮气管切开术的比较。胸罩牧师茴香醚。 [线上]。 2014年,第64卷,第6期,第438-442页。 ISSN 0034-7094。? http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjane.2013.08.002。背景与目的:经皮气管切开术已成为重症监护病房长时间插管的患者的理想选择。气管切开术最重要的好处是可以使病人早日从重症监护室出院,并缩短住院时间。长时间的气管插管有并发症,例如喉损伤,声带麻痹,声门和声门下狭窄,感染和气管损伤。我们研究的目的是评估重症监护病房早期经皮气管切开术比晚期经皮气管切开术的潜在优势。方法:回顾性分析158例成人重症监护室的经皮气管切开术。根据经皮气管切开术前的气管插管时间将患者分为早期气管切开术和晚期气管切开术。气管插管0-7天的气管切开术分为早期,气管插管7天后的气管切开术分为晚期气管切开术。不包括气管切开部位感染的患者,插管困难或潜在困难的患者,18岁以下的患者,呼气末正压高于10 cmH2O的患者以及血液渗出或血小板计数低于50,000 dL?1的患者研究。记录了机械通气和重症监护病房的持续时间。结果:患者的人口统计学数据之间无统计学差异。机械通气时间和早期气管切开术组在重症监护室所花费的时间较短,差异具有统计学意义(p <0.05)。结论:早期气管切开术缩短了机械通气时间,并延长了重症监护病房的住院时间。因此,我们建议对认为长时间插管的患者进行早期气管切开术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号