首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Bloqueio do nervo femoral: avalia??o da analgesia pós-operatória na opera??o de reconstru??o artroscópica do ligamento cruzado anterior
【24h】

Bloqueio do nervo femoral: avalia??o da analgesia pós-operatória na opera??o de reconstru??o artroscópica do ligamento cruzado anterior

机译:股神经阻滞:关节镜下重建前交叉韧带对术后镇痛的评价

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) may be painful in the postoperative period. The primary objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of femoral nerve block (FNB) associated with spinal anesthesia would improve the postoperative pain treatment in ACLR and the secondary objectives were to evaluate tramadol request and adverse events. METHOD: 53 patients were randomly divided into two groups: GA (n =26) received spinal anesthesia and GB (n = 27) received spinal anesthesia and FNB. All patients received multimodal analgesia and rescue analgesics could be requested anytime. Assessments were performed at 6, 12 and 24 hours. RESULTS: There was no difference between both groups regarding demographic and clinical-surgical variables. There was no difference between groups regarding pain intensity. Mean pain scores were higher at 12 hours in GA and there was no change in GB; 55.6% of patients reported moderate pain in GA and 53.8% mild pain in GB. There was no difference regarding tramadol request. There were no serious adverse events: 80.8% of patients in GB had motor block of the thigh and two fell. CONCLUSIONS: Analgesia was more effective with the combination of spinal and FNB, which allowed better control of postoperative pain, assessed 12 hours after anesthesia. There was no difference in tramadol request. Patients in this study had no serious adverse events; however, one must be attentive to motor paralysis and the possibility of falling when FNB is performed.
机译:背景与目的:膝关节前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)在术后可能会很痛苦。这项研究的主要目的是评估与脊髓麻醉相关的股神经阻滞(FNB)的使用是否可以改善ACLR的术后疼痛治疗,而次要目的是评估曲马多的需求和不良事件。方法:53例患者随机分为两组:GA(n = 26)接受脊髓麻醉,GB(n = 27)接受脊髓麻醉和FNB。所有患者均接受了多峰镇痛,可随时要求进行抢救性镇痛。在6、12和24小时进行评估。结果:两组在人口统计学和临床​​手术方面无差异。两组之间疼痛强度没有差异。 GA患者在12小时时的平均疼痛评分较高,而GB则没有变化。 55.6%的患者报告GA中度疼痛,GB的53.8%患者轻度疼痛。曲马多的要求没有差异。没有严重的不良事件:GB患者中80.8%的患者出现大腿运动阻滞,其中2例跌倒。结论:麻醉后12小时评估,脊髓和FNB联合使用镇痛效果更好,可以更好地控制术后疼痛。曲马多的要求没有差异。这项研究的患者没有严重的不良事件。但是,执行FNB时必须注意运动麻痹和跌倒的可能性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号