首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Bloqueio combinado para analgesia de parto: a adi??o de sufentanil ao anestésico local influencia o apgar dos recém-nascidos?
【24h】

Bloqueio combinado para analgesia de parto: a adi??o de sufentanil ao anestésico local influencia o apgar dos recém-nascidos?

机译:联合镇痛分娩镇痛:在局部麻醉药中添加舒芬太尼会影响新生儿的apgar吗?

获取原文
           

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Combined spinal-epidural (CSE) is a very common obstetric technique. However, the literature does not present a standardization regarding the technique, doses, and anesthetics used, besides there is also the controversy about the possibility that the addition of opioids to the local anesthetic causes fetal bradycardia and affects its vitality. The aim of this study was to identify the techniques and anesthetics used in the Anesthesiology Service of the Hospital Universitário of Universidade de S?o Paulo (USP) and determine whether the use of sufentanil associated with the local anesthetic affects Apgar scores of newborns. METHODS: The anesthesiology charts of patients submitted to CSE for labor analgesia over a 12-month period at the Hospital Universitário of USP were analyzed. The use and dose of sufentanil, the type of delivery, and Apgar scores in the 1st, 5th, and 10th minutes were recorded. RESULTS: Of the 635 CSE analyzed, 307 used sufentanil and local anesthetic (SUF Group) and 328 only local anesthetic (LA Group). One hundred and twenty-seven (20%) were done using the needle through the needle technique and the other 508 (80%) used the double puncture technique. There were no differences in the Apgar scores in the 1st, 5th, and 10th minutes between both groups. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sufentanil in the combined spinal-epidural did not change Apgar scores of the newborns.
机译:背景与目的:硬脊膜联合(CSE)是一种非常常见的产科技术。但是,文献中并未提供有关所用技术,剂量和麻醉剂的标准化方法,此外,还有关于在局部麻醉剂中添加阿片类药物导致胎儿心动过缓并影响其生命力的可能性的争议。这项研究的目的是确定圣保罗大学医院(USP)的麻醉学服务所使用的技术和麻醉剂,并确定与局部麻醉剂联用的舒芬太尼是否会影响新生儿的Apgar评分。方法:分析了USP大学医院12个月期间接受CSE进行分娩镇痛的患者的麻醉图。记录舒芬太尼的使用和剂量,分娩类型以及在第1、5和10分钟内的Apgar评分。结果:在分析的635例CSE中,有307例使用了舒芬太尼和局部麻醉药(SUF组),仅328例使用了局部麻醉药(LA组)。通过穿刺技术使用针头完成了一百二十七(20%),使用双穿刺技术完成了另外508(80%)。两组之间在第1、5和10分钟的Apgar评分没有差异。结论:将舒芬太尼用于合并脊柱-硬膜外麻醉并不能改变新生儿的Apgar评分。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号