首页> 外文期刊>Review of Economic Perspectives >Structural Differences and Asymmetric Shocks between the Czech Economy and the Euro Area 12
【24h】

Structural Differences and Asymmetric Shocks between the Czech Economy and the Euro Area 12

机译:捷克经济与欧元区之间的结构差异和不对称冲击12

获取原文
           

摘要

The goal of this paper is to determine whether there exist asymmetric shocks and structural differences between the Czech economy and the Euro Area 12. A New Keynesian DSGE model of a small open economy is used for this purpose. Asymmetric shocks and structural differences are examined in two ways. At first, I examine asymmetry of shocks and sources of structural differences, using model comparison based on the Bayes factor. I do not find substantial evidence in favor of heterogeneity in household preferences. I find slight differences in price and wage formation and substantial difference in interest rate smoothing. However, the main differences are in timing, persistence and volatility of structural shocks. I also investigate impact of structural differences and differences in persistence and volatility of structural shocks on the behavior of both economies, using analysis of impulse-response functions. I find no substantial differences in responses of the main variables to preference shocks. On the other hand, I find much larger volatility and persistence of domestic technology shocks. This contributes to the fact that responses of domestic variables to technology shocks are much larger, and display more gradual and hump-shaped pattern than responses of foreign variables. I also find that responses of foreign variables to labour supply shocks are much more gradual and sluggish than responses of domestic variables. As regards monetary shocks, I find that there is almost no response of foreign inflation to foreign monetary shock while response of domestic inflation to domestic monetary shock displays substantial decline followed by gradual recovery. Responses of foreign variables to cost-push shocks are larger and more volatile than responses of domestic variables.
机译:本文的目的是确定捷克经济与欧元区12之间是否存在不对称冲击和结构差异。为此,使用了一个小型开放经济体的新凯恩斯主义DSGE模型。非对称冲击和结构差异可通过两种方式进行检查。首先,我使用基于贝叶斯因子的模型比较研究冲击的不对称性和结构差异的来源。我找不到大量证据支持家庭偏好中的异质性。我发现价格和工资构成略有不同,利率平滑化也存在较大差异。但是,主要区别在于结构性冲击的时机,持久性和波动性。我还通过对冲激响应函数的分析,研究了结构差异以及结构性冲击的持久性和波动性差异对两个经济体行为的影响。我发现主要变量对偏好冲击的反应没有实质性差异。另一方面,我发现国内技术冲击的波动性和持久性更大。这导致了一个事实,即国内变量对技术冲击的响应要比外国变量的响应大得多,并且显示出更多的渐进式和驼峰形模式。我还发现,外国变量对劳动力供给冲击的反应比国内变量的反应更为缓慢和缓慢。关于货币冲击,我发现外国通货膨胀对外国货币冲击几乎没有反应,而国内通货膨胀对国内货币冲击的反应则显示出大幅下降,然后逐渐恢复。外部变量对成本冲击的响应比内部变量的响应更大,更不稳定。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号