首页> 外文学位 >The political economy of privatization in eastern Europe: Transformative politics and competing imperatives of privatization in Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic.
【24h】

The political economy of privatization in eastern Europe: Transformative politics and competing imperatives of privatization in Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic.

机译:东欧私有化的政治经济学:匈牙利,波兰和捷克共和国的变革性政治和私有化的对立要求。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study tries to explain privatization policies in different East European countries from a neo-institutionalist perspective. Privatization policies in different East European countries are seen as results of multi-level bargaining games by various institutional actors who fight over the spoils of privatization. The outcome of the scramble for ownership depends on resource distribution among factors. A comparison of the privatization processes of Hungary, Poland and the Czech Republic shows that the Czech state was relatively autonomous from social forces and could pursue a more coherent privatization strategy which granted little benefits to enterprise insiders. In Poland, influence from workers' bodies and the self-management forces led to the fragmentation of decision-making power and more redistributive privatization strategies. The managers, as the most influential social actor in Hungary, were the biggest beneficiaries of the privatization process in Hungary.; More detailed analysis of the Hungarian privatization experience shows that the imperatives of transformative politics were important factors behind policy decisions in Hungary. The Hungarian government was caught in a complex web of competing imperatives of redistribution, minimizing social costs, maximizing revenue and efficiency, etc., when it formulated its privatization strategy. The conservative government, which ruled from 1990 to 1994, tried to reduce transformative costs of reform by selective privatization, and tried to enhance its popularity by switching to more redistributive strategies after 1992.; Fieldwork studies showed that the managers of Hungary were able to transfer their rents into new institutionalized forms during the ownership transformation process. The managers, because of their information advantage and connections, had a lot of influence on the privatization of their own firms, and in deciding the winner(s) of the open tenders. They maintained managerial control on their companies, and they also enjoyed a lot of advantages if they wanted to buy out their own firms.
机译:本研究试图从新制度主义的角度解释东欧不同国家的私有化政策。东欧不同国家的私有化政策被看作是为私有化而战的各种机构参与者进行多层次讨价还价游戏的结果。所有权争夺的结果取决于因素之间的资源分配。匈牙利,波兰和捷克共和国的私有化过程的比较表明,捷克国家相对独立于社会力量,可以奉行更加连贯的私有化战略,这对企业内部人士几乎没有好处。在波兰,工人团体和自我管理力量的影响导致决策权分散化,并实行了更具再分配性的私有化战略。作为匈牙利最有影响力的社会行为者,管理者是匈牙利私有化进程的最大受益者。对匈牙利私有化经验的更详细分析表明,变革性政治势在必行是匈牙利政策决策的重要因素。匈牙利政府制定私有化战略时,陷入了一个复杂的网络,其中涉及竞争性的重新分配的要求,最小化的社会成本,最大化的收入和效率等。 1990年至1994年执政的保守政府试图通过选择性私有化来降低改革的变革成本,并试图通过在1992年后转向更具再分配性的战略来提高改革的知名度。实地调查研究表明,匈牙利的管理人员能够在所有权转换过程中将其租金转为新的制度化形式。经理们由于其信息优势和联系而对自己公司的私有化以及决定公开招标的中标者有很大的影响。他们保持对公司的管理控制权,而且如果想收购自己的公司,他们也享有很多优势。

著录项

  • 作者

    Ma, Ngok.;

  • 作者单位

    University of California, Los Angeles.;

  • 授予单位 University of California, Los Angeles.;
  • 学科 Political Science General.; Economics General.
  • 学位 Ph.D.
  • 年度 1998
  • 页码 334 p.
  • 总页数 334
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类 政治理论;经济学;
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-17 11:48:45

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号