...
首页> 外文期刊>Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia >Analgesia controlada pelo paciente com fentanil e sufentanil no pós-operatório de reconstru??o de ligamentos do joelho: estudo comparativo
【24h】

Analgesia controlada pelo paciente com fentanil e sufentanil no pós-operatório de reconstru??o de ligamentos do joelho: estudo comparativo

机译:芬太尼和舒芬太尼自控镇痛术后膝关节韧带重建的比较研究

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Epidural opioids, associated or not to local anesthetics, have been used for postoperative analgesia in continuous infusion and/or patient controlled boluses. The aim of this study was to compare postoperative analgesia provided by epidural fentanyl or sufentanil, in bolus or continuous infusion, in patients submitted to knee ligament reconstruction. METHODS: Seventy ASA I - II patients, aged 16 to 47 years, were randomly distributed in two groups. All patients were submitted to epidural anesthesia with 0.5% bupivacaine (100 mg) with epinephrine 1:200,000 associated to fentanyl (100 mg). At the end of the procedure, patients received epidural fentanyl (Group F) or sufentanil (Group S) in continuous infusion plus patient controlled boluses. Group F infusion solution was made of saline (85 ml), 500 μg fentanyl (10 ml) and 0.5% bupivacaine (5 ml). Group S solution was made of saline (92 ml), 150 μg sufentanil (3 ml) and 0.5% plain bupivacaine (5 ml). Infusion pump′s flow was initially programmed to 5 ml.h-1, with 2 ml patient controlled bolus doses every 15 minutes at most, for both groups. The following parameters were compared: pain, number of patient controlled boluses, opioid consumption, motor block, sedation and side-effects. RESULTS: There have been no statistically significant difference in analgesia quality between groups, being in most cases rated good (AVS 0 to 2). There has been a significant difference in the number of patient controlled boluses, with Group F needing more boluses than Group S. There has been no difference in total infused solution volume and total infusion time. There has been no motor block after beginning of patient-controlled analgesia. Vomiting and urine retention incidences were higher in Group S and there have been no significant differences in sedation and pruritus between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Epidural fentanyl or sufentanil in continuous epidural infusion and patient-controlled boluses in the doses used in this study have induced excellent postoperative analgesia. However, sufentanil caused more severe side effects than fentanyl.
机译:背景与目的:硬膜外阿片类药物与局部麻醉药有关或无关,已用于连续输注和/或患者控制的大剂量的术后镇痛。这项研究的目的是比较硬膜外芬太尼或舒芬太尼在推注或连续输注的情况下对膝韧带重建患者的镇痛效果。方法:将70例16至47岁的ASA I-II患者随机分为两组。所有患者均接受0.5%布比卡因(100毫克)和肾上腺素1:200,000与芬太尼(100毫克)相关的硬膜外麻醉。手术结束时,患者接受连续输注的硬膜外芬太尼(F组)或舒芬太尼(S组)加患者控制的大剂量。 F组输注溶液由盐水(85 ml),500μg芬太尼(10 ml)和0.5%布比卡因(5 ml)制成。 S组溶液由盐水(92 ml),150μg舒芬太尼(3 ml)和0.5%普通布比卡因(5 ml)制成。两组最初将输液泵的流量编程为5 ml.h-1,最多每15分钟使用2 ml患者控制的推注剂量。比较了以下参数:疼痛,患者控制的单剂量,阿片类药物的摄入,运动阻滞,镇静作用和副作用。结果:两组之间的镇痛质量没有统计学上的显着差异,大多数情况下评定为良好(AVS 0至2)。病人控制的推注数量存在显着差异,F组比S组需要更多推注。总输注溶液量和总输注时间没有差异。开始患者自控镇痛后,没有运动障碍。 S组的呕吐和尿urine留发生率较高,并且两组之间的镇静和瘙痒没有显着差异。结论:硬膜外芬太尼或舒芬太尼在连续硬膜外输注和患者控制的大剂量本研究中使用的剂量已引起了良好的术后镇痛作用。然而,舒芬太尼比芬太尼引起更严重的副作用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号