首页> 外文期刊>Retina Today >Retina Today - PDT for Subretinal Fluid From Choroidal Nevus (November/December 2015)
【24h】

Retina Today - PDT for Subretinal Fluid From Choroidal Nevus (November/December 2015)

机译:今日视网膜-脉络膜痣视网膜下液的PDT(2015年11月/ 12月)

获取原文
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

At a Glance • Choroidal nevus is a benign, typically asymptomatic condition that requires only observation. • Factors that predict nevus progression to melanoma are related to thickness, subretinal fluid, symptoms, overlying orange pigment, tumor margin near the optic disc, ultrasonographic hollowness, absence of halo around the tumor, and absence of drusen over the tumor. • Lesions with three or more of these risk factors are much more likely to transform into malignant melanoma. Choroidal nevus is a benign melanocytic lesion of the eye. Prevalence of this tumor is reported to be 4% to 7% in white populations and approximately 1% in black and Chinese populations in the United States.1,2 Choroidal nevus can produce symptoms of visual loss or floaters related to subfoveal location, overlying retinal edema or photoreceptor loss, choroidal neovascularization (CNV), and related subretinal fluid. This article provides background on choroidal nevus and reviews the use of photodynamic therapy (PDT) in a patient with a known stable lesion. THE ROLE OF SUBRETINAL FLUID In an analysis of 2514 eyes with choroidal nevus, eight clinical features (including subretinal fluid) were found to predict risk for transformation into melanoma.3 By univariable analysis, the presence of subretinal fluid imparted a relative risk for nevus transformation of 4.5 if trace, 7.2 if moderate, and 12.8 if severe, compared with a nevus that did not have subretinal fluid.3 For example, in that series, of the 266 nevi with clinical evidence of subretinal fluid, 71 (27%) showed growth into melanoma and 195 (73%) showed no growth.3 That study was conducted prior to the universal use of optical coherence tomography (OCT), and the presence of subretinal fluid was judged based on clinical features; thus, there were likely some patients with a minor amount of subretinal fluid who were overlooked due to subtle clinical findings. However, that study’s findings indicate that the presence of subretinal fluid can be a feature of choroidal nevus and does not necessarily signify evolution to melanoma. There are cases in which subretinal fluid overlying a bland subfoveal or perifoveal nevus leads to visual loss and requires medical intervention. Treatment options in such cases, particularly those in which the nevus shows a lack of other risk factors for melanoma, include laser photocoagulation, transpupillary thermotherapy, PDT, and anti-VEGF therapy. If the leak is in the macular area, and specifically in the foveal region, then laser and thermotherapy should be avoided because of the potential for further visual compromise. Anti-VEGF therapy or PDT are first-line therapies. In a small series of 17 cases, one to three sessions of PDT were successful in treatment of subretinal fluid secondary to choroidal nevus; mean visual acuity improved from 20/80 to 20/60 following treatment.4 Herein, we describe a patient with choroidal nevus and subretinal fluid necessitating PDT. Figure 1. Suspicious choroidal nevus in the left eye of a 55-year-old woman whose fundus photography showed a subtle juxtapapillary amelanotic choroidal nevus (A). Subretinal fluid was clinically detected in the macular region and confirmed as fresh subretinal fluid with shaggy photoreceptors on enhanced-depth imaging optical coherence tomography (EDI-OCT) (B). Figure 2. Two months following treatment with PDT, the patient’s fundus photography showed involution of the tumor and resolution of the subretinal fluid, leaving RPE alterations (A). EDI-OCT documented the subretinal fluid resolution, which left an abnormality in the ellipsoid layer and photoreceptor tips overlying the thin choroidal mass (B). CASE REPORT A 55-year-old white woman with known stable choroidal nevus in the left eye for 13 years developed mild visual acuity loss in 2013. At that time, examination revealed visual acuity of 20/20 in the right eye and 20/30 in the left eye. The
机译:概览•脉络膜痣是良性的,通常无症状,仅需观察即可。 •预测痣发展为黑色素瘤的因素与厚度,视网膜下液,症状,橙色色素覆盖,视盘附近的肿瘤边缘,超声空洞,肿瘤周围没有光晕以及肿瘤上没有玻璃膜疣有关。 •具有三个或更多这些危险因素的病变更有可能转变为恶性黑色素瘤。脉络膜痣是眼睛的良性黑素细胞病变。在美国,据报道该肿瘤的患病率为4%至7%,在美国黑人和华裔人群中约为1%。1,2脉络膜痣可产生视力减退或与视网膜中央凹下位置相关的漂浮物症状,覆盖视网膜水肿或感光细胞丧失,脉络膜新生血管(CNV)和相关的视网膜下液。本文提供脉络膜痣的背景,并回顾光动力疗法(PDT)在已知稳定病变患者中的使用。视网膜下液的作用在对2514例脉络膜痣眼进行分析时,发现八种临床特征(包括视网膜下液)可预测转化为黑色素瘤的风险。3通过单因素分析,视网膜下液的存在赋予了痣转化的相对风险。与没有视网膜下液的痣相比,有痕迹的为4.5(如果有痕迹的话)为7.2(中等),如果有严重,则为12.8。3例如,在该系列中,有临床证据的视网膜下液的266个痣中有71(27%) [3]该研究是在普遍使用光学相干断层扫描(OCT)之前进行的,并根据临床特征判断是否存在视网膜下积液。因此,由于微妙的临床发现,有些患者的视网膜下液很少,因此被忽视了。但是,该研究结果表明,视网膜下液的存在可能是脉络膜痣的一个特征,并不一定意味着进化为黑色素瘤。在某些情况下,视网膜上方的小凹或小凹下痣覆盖液会导致视力下降,需要医疗干预。在这种情况下,尤其是痣显示缺乏其他黑色素瘤危险因素的治疗方法包括激光光凝,经瞳孔热疗,PDT和抗VEGF治疗。如果泄漏发生在黄斑区域,特别是在中央凹区域,则应避免激光和热疗,因为这可能会进一步损害视力。抗VEGF疗法或PDT是一线疗法。在少量的17例患者中,PDT治疗脉络膜痣继发的视网膜下液成功进行了1至3次。平均视力从治疗后的20/80提高到20 /60。4在此,我们描述了脉络膜痣和视网膜下液需要PDT的患者。图1.一名55岁妇女的左眼可疑脉络膜痣,其眼底照相显示出细微的近乳头状乳突性脉络膜痣(A)。在黄斑区临床检测到视网膜下液,并通过增强深度成像光学相干断层扫描(EDI-OCT)将其确认为新鲜的视网膜下液,并带有蓬松的感光体(B)。图2.用PDT治疗两个月后,患者的眼底照相显示出肿瘤的消退和视网膜下液的消退,留下了RPE改变(A)。 EDI-OCT记录了视网膜下液的分辨率,该分辨率在椭圆形层和覆盖薄脉络膜肿块(B)的感光器尖端上留下了异常。病例报告一名55岁的白人妇女在左眼中已知脉络膜痣稳定13年,2013年出现轻度视力丧失。当时,检查发现右眼的视力为20/20,而右眼的视力为20/30。在左眼。的

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号