...
首页> 外文期刊>Research on Humanities and Social Sciences >The contradiction of Demotorisation: a Literature Argument
【24h】

The contradiction of Demotorisation: a Literature Argument

机译:非机动车化的矛盾:文学争论

获取原文
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

This paper is aimed at outlining the flexibility of capitalist consumption (Harvey, 1990) through a review of literature that has condemned the modernist era of the automobile for its consumerist tendencies but has failed to recognise that this flexibility of capitalism has been re-invented through demotorisation as a new tool for consumer culture. Demotorisation here is used to refer to the removal or partial removal of cars from roads and replacing it with cycling and walking. The research employs a review of theoretical as well as secondary empirical analysis. It must be emphasised that this paper is not aimed at discrediting demotorisation of streets but rather to point its postmodern nuances. Key Words: Demotorisation, Pedestrianisation, Consumerism, Automobile, Cycling, gentrification.
机译:本文旨在通过回顾一些文献来概述资本主义消费的灵活性(Harvey,1990),该文献谴责了汽车的现代主义时代的消费主义倾向,但未能认识到资本主义的这种灵活性是通过重新发明而来的。取消汽车化作为消费文化的新工具。这里的非机动车化是指从道路上移走或部分移走汽车,并以骑自行车和步行代替。该研究采用了理论和辅助实证分析方法。必须强调的是,本文并非旨在抹黑街道的减摩功能,而是指出其后现代的细微差别。关键字:减机动车,行人专用,消费主义,汽车,骑自行车,高档化。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号