首页> 外文期刊>Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis. >Predictive value of a bleeding score for postpartum hemorrhage
【24h】

Predictive value of a bleeding score for postpartum hemorrhage

机译:出血评分对产后出血的预测价值

获取原文
           

摘要

Background A reliable screening tool that could contribute to the identification of women with an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage would be of great clinical significance. Objectives The aim of this study was to examine the added predictive value of a bleeding assessment tool for postpartum hemorrhage exceeding 1000?mL. Patients/Methods Prospective two‐center cohort study among 1147 pregnant women visiting the outpatient clinic or the maternity ward who completed a bleeding assessment tool prior to birth. The condensed MCMDM‐1VWD bleeding assessment tool was adjusted to a questionnaire that could be used as a self‐assessment bleeding tool. A score of ≥4 was considered to be abnormal. Results In the 1147 pregnant women in our cohort, bleeding scores ranged from ?3 to 13, with a median of 1 (IQR ?1 to 3); 197 (17%) women developed postpartum hemorrhage. Among women with a history of postpartum hemorrhage 29% developed postpartum hemorrhage. Among 147 women with an abnormal bleeding score (≥4), 27 (18%) developed postpartum hemorrhage, whereas the remaining 170 cases of postpartum hemorrhage had a normal bleeding score. Despite the high incidence of postpartum hemorrhage, the ability of the bleeding score to predict postpartum hemorrhage was poor: area under receiver operating curve 0.53 (95% CI 0.49‐0.58) for postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) ≥1000?mL. Conclusions A history of significant postpartum hemorrhage was associated with an increased risk of subsequent postpartum hemorrhage. However, screening with a bleeding assessment tool did not help to discriminate women who will develop postpartum hemorrhage from women who will not.
机译:背景技术可靠的筛查工具可有助于识别产后出血风险增加的妇女,具有重要的临床意义。目的本研究的目的是检验产后出血超过1000?mL的出血评估工具的附加预测价值。患者/方法对1147名在门诊或产房就诊的孕妇进行了前瞻性两中心队列研究,这些孕妇在出生前完成了出血评估工具。将压缩的MCMDM-1VWD出血评估工具调整为可以用作自我评估出血工具的调查表。得分≥4被认为是异常的。结果在我们队列中的1147名孕妇中,出血评分范围从?3到13,中位数为1(IQR为1-3)。 197名(17%)妇女发生了产后出血。在有产后出血史的女性中,有29%发生了产后出血。在147个出血评分异常(≥4)的女性中,有27个(18%)发生了产后出血,而其余170例产后出血的出血评分正常。尽管产后出血发生率很高,但出血评分预测产后出血的能力仍然很差:产后出血(PPH)≥1000?mL的接受者操作曲线下面积为0.53(95%CI 0.49-0.58)。结论重大的产后出血史与随后的产后出血风险增加有关。但是,使用出血评估工具进行筛查并不能将产后出血的妇女与不会出血的妇女区分开。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号