首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Spinoza, Sin as Debt, and the Sin of the Prophets
【24h】

Spinoza, Sin as Debt, and the Sin of the Prophets

机译:斯宾诺莎,作为债务的罪过和先知的罪过

获取原文
       

摘要

In Payback: Debt and the Shadow Side of Wealth , Margaret Atwood examines different forms of debt and their various interrelations. Her work invites, but does not provide, an account or philosophy of debt or its deep implication in Christian beliefs such as sin, satisfaction, and atonement. This paper aims to bring to light insights into the link between debt and some aspects of Christian belief, especially the ideas of sin and satisfaction. It draws upon another unlikely source-the Ethics and political treatises of Spinoza. Spinoza’s view at least implies that the idea that sin (understood as the voluntary actions of a free agent) creates a ‘debt’ that is ‘paid’ by punishment is a potentially dangerous ‘fiction.’ Spinoza intuits that the subsumption of the idea of debt into notions of retribution, vengeance, satisfaction, or atonement, are driven by ‘superstition,’ envy, and hatred, and through imitating others’ hateful ideas of oneself. The idea of ‘debt’ is an artefact of civil authority that can only assume affective, normative purchase through internalizing fear of the implicit threat of punishment inherent in law. I will seek, finally, to suggest an implicit critique in Spinoza of the imaginative subsumption of debt into the space of religio .
机译:玛格丽特·阿特伍德(Margaret Atwood)在《投资回报:债务与财富的阴影面》中研究了不同形式的债务及其各种相互关系。她的工作邀请但不提供债务的说明或哲学,或者其对基督教信仰(如罪恶,满足和赎罪)的深层影响。本文旨在揭示债务与基督教信仰某些方面之间的联系,特别是罪恶和满足的观念。它借鉴了另一个不太可能的来源-斯宾诺莎的道德和政治论文。斯宾诺莎的观点至少暗示着,罪(被理解为自由行为者的自愿行为)创造了一种“债务”并通过惩罚“偿还”的观点是一种潜在的危险“虚构”。 “迷信”,“嫉妒”和“仇恨”,以及通过模仿他人对自己的可恶想法,将债务变成报应,报仇,满足或赎罪的观念。 “债务”的概念是民事权力的产物,只能通过内化对法律固有的隐含的威胁威胁的恐惧来承担情感,规范的购买。最后,我将寻求在斯宾诺莎提出一个暗示性的批判,即将债务想象地纳入宗教信仰空间。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号