首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Faith and Freedom: The Qur’anic Notion of Freedom of Religion vs. the Act of Changing Religion and Thoughts on the Implications for Malaysia
【24h】

Faith and Freedom: The Qur’anic Notion of Freedom of Religion vs. the Act of Changing Religion and Thoughts on the Implications for Malaysia

机译:信仰与自由:古兰经的宗教自由观念与改变宗教的行为以及对马来西亚的影响的思考

获取原文
       

摘要

The issue of freedom of religion has always been situated at the intersection between human rights, personal freedom of choice, religious belief and apostasy. While freedom supporters argue that one is free to choose his or her religion, including changing religion, the Qur’an has made it clear that Islam allows changing of religion so long as it is from any religion to Islam and not from Islam to another religion. Apostatizing from Islam is one of the gravest enormities cautioned with eternal punishment. In interpreting the meaning of freedom of religion and restricting it from the “freedom” to change religion, Muslim scholars have been careful to draw a line distinguishing between the two. This article examines the different interpretations given by scholars on the issue of freedom of religion according to the Qur’an. By using historical and thematic analysis, the writers evaluate the mufassirins’ (scholars of exegesis) views on the related Qur’anic verses. Interpretations of the classical Islamic legal sources are also examined to identify their opinions on the consequences of leaving Islam, followed by contemporary opinions. The objective is to show the development and changes, if any, in the approaches taken regarding the limitations of freedom of religion. This will enlighten the ways to handle the issue of apostasy, as it is seen as a highly divisive and controversial issue, and to highlight an ideal approach for Malaysia.
机译:宗教自由问题一直是人权,个人选择自由,宗教信仰和叛教之间的交集。自由支持者争辩说,一个人可以自由选择他或她的宗教,包括改变宗教,但古兰经明确指出,伊斯兰教允许改变宗教,只要它是从任何一种宗教到伊斯兰教,而不是从伊斯兰教到另一种宗教即可。 。背叛伊斯兰教是被永远惩罚的最严重的罪恶之一。穆斯林学者在解释宗教自由的含义并将其限制在改变宗教的“自由”中时,一直谨慎地划出区分两者的界限。本文考察了古兰经对宗教自由问题学者的不同解释。通过使用历史和主题分析,作者评估了穆法西林对有关古兰经经文的看法。还检查了古典伊斯兰法律来源的解释,以查明他们对离开伊斯兰的后果的看法,其次是当代看法。目的是显示在限制宗教自由方面所采取的方法的发展和变化。这将启发处理叛教问题的方法,因为这被认为是一个高度分裂和有争议的问题,并突出了马来西亚的理想方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号