首页> 外文期刊>Religions >Buddhism and Legislative Measures on Theft in Mongolia (The 18th Century?¢????the Early 20th Century)
【24h】

Buddhism and Legislative Measures on Theft in Mongolia (The 18th Century?¢????the Early 20th Century)

机译:蒙古的佛教和盗窃立法措施(18世纪-20世纪初)

获取原文
       

摘要

This article examines the issue of theft as addressed in two legal texts?¢????the Khalkha Regulations and the Laws and Regulations to Actually Follow?¢????which functioned as the customary and statutory laws for Khalkha Mongolia at different periods, and which governed the life of lay and monastic Buddhists. The article approaches the concept of theft as a broader category that encompasses both the direct and indirect modes of theft that involve various types of deception and fraud, whereby a person can defraud the another of his rightful belongings. The analysis of the given topic in this paper is based on the two texts from that administered the conduct of monks and laity who belonged to the personal estate, or Great Shavi, to Jebtsundamba Khutukhtus of Mongolia, the record of actual course cases dealt by the Ministry of Great Shavi, and the Mongol Code of Law instituted by the Qing administration for its Mongolian colony. Although a comparative analysis of these laws with the minor banner laws or those instituted among Oirats may reveal some important differences, it is beyond the scope of the article and deserves a through study.
机译:本文研究了两个法律文本中提到的盗窃问题:《哈尔卡规定》和《实际遵循的法律和法规》,这两个时期分别用作哈尔卡蒙古的习惯法和成文法,它统治着佛教徒和僧侣的生活。该文章将盗窃的概念作为一个更广泛的类别,涵盖了涉及各种欺骗和欺诈的直接和间接盗窃模式,从而使一个人可以欺骗另一人的正当财产。本文对给定主题的分析是基于管理蒙古族的Jebtsundamba Khutukhtus属于个人财产或大谢维族的僧侣和俗人的行为的两个文本,而这两个文本是由蒙古人处理的实际课程案例的记录。大沙威部和清政府为蒙古殖民地制定的《蒙古法律法》。尽管对这些法律与次要横幅法律或在Oirats中制定的法律进行比较分析可能会发现一些重要的差异,但这超出了本文的范围,值得进行深入研究。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号